Cross Green Cottage, Cross Green, Cockfield, Bury St. Edmunds, IP30 0LG

UPRN:200004222806-Beds -Built -

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band EEPC: -

Data freshness:Listing· freshOwnership· freshRisk· 5mo agoCrime· freshConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 5mo ago

Cross Green Cottage, Cross Green, Cockfield, Bury St. Edmunds, IP30 0LG

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£677,000

£609k - £745kMedium

Estimate

£677k

Range

£609k – £745k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Cross Green Cottage earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 60/100. Investment score 51/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (9/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

60/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

51/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

9/ 100

Low

Walkability

9/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 5Bike 28

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +11.4% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 10 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 200004222806· as of 10 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity12.8/15
163 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 200004222806Valuation edge · as of 10 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 13 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
4. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£677,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth-1.3%

5y Growth+1.7%

10y Growth+3.2%

Last Sold Price£280,000 (2014-06-10)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

5IP30 0LG

Approval Rate

100%12mo

Development

low

DC/26/04256
Notification of works to Trees in a Conservation Area - Fell 2 No. Acacia (T1 and T2), 1 No. ivy covered stump (T3) and 1 No. Conifer (T4). Reduce height of crown of 2 No. Acacia (T5 and T6) by 2m and reduce lateral spread by 2m.
Pending
DC/26/04165
Notification of Works to Trees in a Conservation Area - Fell 1 No. Holly (T1) 1 x Holly - Fell
Approved
DC/26/00311
Application for Listed Building Consent - Change of roof material and window arrangement of the conservatory.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership67.9%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change2014-06-10
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

9 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£30,118

Population Density-

Owner Occupied75%

Age Distribution

0-15 13%16-64 54%65+ 33%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Cockfield Church of England Primary School
0.7 mi
Inspected as Cockfield Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School (URN 124694) on 25 Feb 2020
All Saints' Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School, Lawshall
2.0 mi
Outstanding
Great Whelnetham Church of England Primary School
2.5 mi
Good
Lavenham Community Primary School
4.2 mi
-

2 of 10 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

The Lodge Cross Green
-
£745k
-
Steward House Cross Green
-
£725k
-
Acacia House Cross Green
-
£840k
-
Old Mill Cottages Cross Green
-
£325k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN