1 South Lea, Kingsnorth, Ashford, TN23 3EH

UPRN:200004380133-Beds -Built -

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band FEPC: -

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshRisk· 5mo agoCrime· freshConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 1mo ago

1 South Lea, Kingsnorth, Ashford, TN23 3EH

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

16 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£619,000

£495k - £743kLow

Estimate

£619k

Range

£495k – £743k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

1 South Lea earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 68/100. Investment score 54/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (36/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

68/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

54/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

20/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

36/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 8Bike 55

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires valuation_edge (estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor)
headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Risk & liquidity9.2/15
475 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 40%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 11 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Valuation edge could not be scored
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the valuation edge gap before relying on the score.
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£619,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth-0.5%

5y Growth+2.1%

10y Growth+3.3%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0TN23 3EH

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

OTH/2026/1979
T1 & T2 Oak - Reduce height of T1 & T2 by 2m to approximately 11m maintaining natural/current shape of crown structure. Reduce lower eastern radial spread of T1 and T2 back to previous reduction points. Reduce upper eastern radial spread of T1 and T2 to fall into shape with the reduced top height and lower radial spread. Reduce western radial spread of T1 to fall into shape with the reduced top height and eastern radial spread. Reason for works: To promote the establishment of a balanced canopy following past pruning works to both trees, improvement of light and initiate a long-term management programme for the trees.
Pending
PA/2026/1903
Two-storey side and rear extension with loft conversion and dormers to front elevation. Erection of a detached garage with annex above following demolition of existing garages.
Pending
OTH/2026/1742
Details submitted pursuant to Condition 5 (AC Units) of Planning Permission PA/2024/1317
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership63.3%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

3 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£32,991

Population Density-

Owner Occupied77%

Age Distribution

0-15 22%16-64 63%65+ 15%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Kings Park School
0.3 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Kingsnorth Church of England Primary School
0.3 mi
Good
The John Wallis Church of England Academy
0.6 mi
Good
Furley Park Primary Academy
0.7 mi
Area grades2024
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.

3 of 13 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

2 South Lea
-
£450k
-
8 South Lea
-
£323k
-
6 South Lea
-
£300k
-
8 South Lea
-
£250k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN