29A Ridgeview Road, London, N20 0HH

UPRN:200098548Converted Flat3 bedsBuilt 1900-1929

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: -EPC: C (72)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 6mo agoEPC· 3mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

2 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£513,000

£410k - £615kLow

Estimate

£513k

Range

£410k – £615k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£2,250

£2k - £2k

Monthly

£2,250

Yield

4.91%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

29A Ridgeview Road earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 81/100. Investment score 68/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (67/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

81/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

68/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

6/ 100

Low

Walkability

67/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 43Bike 60

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires valuation_edge (estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor)

What we could establish

Rental economics0/40
gross yield 4.9%; range width penalty ×0.84
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 2250/mo (range 2050-2450)· as of 9 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -797/mo, -35% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing; leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress assumes GBP 0
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 2 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Risk & liquidity9.2/15
150 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 40%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Economics

What happens to your money

Your assumptions

Purchase price£550,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£2,250/mo

Evidenced range £2,050-£2,450

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £183,800
Net cash flow: -£299/mo
Cash on cash: -1.9%
Score at this price: -

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.21 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 2250/mo (range 2050-2450)Rental economics · as of 9 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 2 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 2 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Valuation edge could not be scored
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 2250/mo (range 2050-2450)

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
3. Fill the valuation edge gap before relying on the score.
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£513,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£2,250

Gross Yield4.91%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+6.7%

5y Growth-0.1%

10y Growth+2.9%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

2N20 0HH

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

TPP/0668/26
1 x Mature Lime Tree (aplicants ref. T1) - Reduce crown by approximately 2.5-3m, carefully reducing the height and lateral spread of the canopy. Selectively thin areas of excessive and congested growth where appropriate 10-15%, removing crossing, rubbing and poorly positioned branches to improve the overall crown structure. Cut back and remove dead, diseased and defective wood. Lift the lower crown by approximately 2-2.5m. Standing in T206 of Tree Preservation Order.
Pending
TCP/0666/26
1 x Cotoneaster (applicants ref. T1) - Reduce vertical growth in whole crown by 0.5 metres. (Exempt) 1 x Smoke Tree (applicants ref. T2) - Reduce vertical growth in whole crown by 0.5 metres. (Exempt) 1 x Hornbeam (applicants ref. T3) - Crown thin by 20% to allow light penetration. Beech Hedge (applicants ref. H4) - Reduce height by 0.5 metres. (Exempt) 3 x Apple Trees (applicants ref. G5) - Thin by 10%, to allow light penetration. 1 x Cherry (applicants ref. T6) - Reduce vertical and lateral growth by 1 metre back to most recent previous pruning points. 2 x Silver Birch (applicants ref. T7) - Reduce vertical and lateral growth by 1 metre back to most recent previous pruning points.
Pending
26/3755/CON
Submission of details of conditions 3 (Site Management Plan) and 4 (Cycle Parking Spaces) pursuant to planning permission 26/1537/FUL dated 19/08/26
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership44.6%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining88 yrs
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeLeasehold
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

16 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£39,239

Population Density5,255 /km²

Owner Occupied57%

Age Distribution

0-15 17%16-64 60%65+ 23%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Finchley Catholic High School
0.2 mi
Good
St John's CofE Primary and Nursery School
0.3 mi
Good
Alma Primary
0.4 mi
Good
Woodridge Primary School
0.5 mi
Area grades2025
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.

5 of 11 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

23 Ridgeview Road
-
£825k
-
49 Ridgeview Road
-
£760k
-
41 Ridgeview Road
-
£580k
-
17 Ridgeview Road
-
£875k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN