30 Ridgeview Road, London, N20 0HJ

UPRN:200098579-Beds -Built 1930-1949

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band EEPC: D (58)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 6mo agoEPC· 1mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£848,000

£763k - £933kMedium

Estimate

£848k

Range

£763k – £933k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

30 Ridgeview Road earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 81/100. Investment score 68/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (67/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

81/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

68/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

6/ 100

Low

Walkability

67/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 40Bike 59

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +5.7% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 10 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 200098579· as of 10 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity12.8/15
150 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 200098579Valuation edge · as of 10 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£848,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth+6.7%

5y Growth-0.1%

10y Growth+2.9%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

2N20 0HJ

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

TPP/0668/26
1 x Mature Lime Tree (aplicants ref. T1) - Reduce crown by approximately 2.5-3m, carefully reducing the height and lateral spread of the canopy. Selectively thin areas of excessive and congested growth where appropriate 10-15%, removing crossing, rubbing and poorly positioned branches to improve the overall crown structure. Cut back and remove dead, diseased and defective wood. Lift the lower crown by approximately 2-2.5m. Standing in T206 of Tree Preservation Order.
Pending
TCP/0666/26
1 x Cotoneaster (applicants ref. T1) - Reduce vertical growth in whole crown by 0.5 metres. (Exempt) 1 x Smoke Tree (applicants ref. T2) - Reduce vertical growth in whole crown by 0.5 metres. (Exempt) 1 x Hornbeam (applicants ref. T3) - Crown thin by 20% to allow light penetration. Beech Hedge (applicants ref. H4) - Reduce height by 0.5 metres. (Exempt) 3 x Apple Trees (applicants ref. G5) - Thin by 10%, to allow light penetration. 1 x Cherry (applicants ref. T6) - Reduce vertical and lateral growth by 1 metre back to most recent previous pruning points. 2 x Silver Birch (applicants ref. T7) - Reduce vertical and lateral growth by 1 metre back to most recent previous pruning points.
Pending
26/3737/FUL
Subdivision of the ground floor flat into 2no. self-contained flats including single storey rear extension with rear patio area. Associated refuse/recycling/cycle storage and associated amenities
Pending

View Planning Timeline