9 Beresford Avenue, Hull, HU6 7LS

UPRN:21012003End Terrace House5 bedsBuilt 1900-1929

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band BEPC: D (65)

Data freshness:Price Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

2 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

20 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£223,000

£212k - £235kHigh

Estimate

£223k

Range

£212k – £235k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,500

£1k - £2k

Monthly

£1,500

Yield

9.00%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

9 Beresford Avenue earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 75/100. Investment score 52/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is good (79/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

75/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

52/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

20/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

79/ 100

High

Transit & Bike

Transit 20Bike 73

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

High confidence3 independent sourcesListing checked 27 Oct 2026

Every component scored, and three or more independent sources agree.

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [AVM +10.3% (HIGH), sold-comps +17.4%, £/sqft +17.3%] → measured edge +0.50pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 21012003· as of 9 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 9.2%· as of 20 Oct 2026
Rental economics40/40
gross yield 11.7% on contractual rent (listing-disclosed tenancy); contractual 2100/mo far above the 1500/mo estimate - credited at the 1.3x cap, verify
- listing_factscontractual rent 2100/mo (tenanted)· as of 27 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin23.6/30
stressed cash flow +460/mo, +24% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); passes the stress
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 27 Oct 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
no listing-history inputs (first published date, price changes)
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
239 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivityScores 80+ up to £205,000

£150,000£230,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£200,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,500/mo

Evidenced range £1,450-£1,550

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £62,800
Net cash flow: £363/mo
Cash on cash: 6.9%
Score at this price: 81

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 2.22 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 21012003Valuation edge · as of 9 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 9.2%Valuation edge · as of 20 Oct 2026
listing_factscontractual rent 2100/mo (tenanted)Rental economics · as of 27 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 27 Oct 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
contractual rent 2100/mo (tenanted)
Seller motivation could not be scored
no listing-history inputs (first published date, price changes)

Property risk deep-dive →flood, subsidence, crime, environment - the full domain

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Set your walk-away price before viewing - above £205,000 the deal stops scoring well.
Computed by re-running the score at higher prices.
3. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£223,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,500

Gross Yield9.00%

1y Growth-6.5%

3y Growth+4.5%

5y Growth+4.4%

10y Growth+3.8%

Last Sold Price£90,400 (2004-09-16)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0HU6 7LS

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/01042/CONDET
Discharge of conditions for 26/00285/TPO - Works to trees covered by TPO no.302: Fell T1 ash due to poor form. Fell T2 ash monolith as already dead. Prune T3 ash by reducing westerly branch of main union fork by approx 4m to take the weight out of it, due to poor union fork being included. Prune T4 ash by reducing the branch growing over the telephone wires and seating area back past the fork to the regrowth point. (Revised description) - conditions 1
Pending
26/01018/CONDET
Discharge of conditions 26/00555/PAAD - Demolition of Blocks 3 (Former Boathouse) & 8 (Changing Pavilion) (Application to determine whether prior approval is required for the method of demolition and the reinstatement of the site) conditions 3 and 8
Pending
26/00995/FULL
External alterations at first floor level including the formation and installation of one new window opening to the north elevation of the building.
Pending

View Planning Timeline