9 Brooklyn Avenue, Hull, HU5 1ND

UPRN:21017668Terrace Property3 bedsBuilt 1900-1929

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band AEPC: E (52)

Data freshness:Price Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 5mo ago

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£90,000

£85k - £94kHigh

Estimate

£90k

Range

£85k – £94k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£550

£550 - £600

Monthly

£550

Yield

7.76%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

9 Brooklyn Avenue earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 64/100. Investment score 52/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is moderate. Walkability is good (78/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

64/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

52/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

60/ 100

Elevated

Walkability

78/ 100

High

Transit & Bike

Transit 20Bike 79

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence1 independent sourceListing checked 4 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +5.6% (HIGH), sold-comps -1.2%, £/sqft -1.7%] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 12 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 21017668· as of 12 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 6 comps, dispersion 15.7%· as of 21 Oct 2026
Rental economics34.5/40
gross yield 9.3% on contractual rent (listing-disclosed tenancy)
- listing_factscontractual rent 660/mo (tenanted)· as of 4 Nov 2026
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -3/mo, -1% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 4 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 132 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 4 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
653 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£64,000£97,500

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£85,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£550/mo

Evidenced range £550-£600

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £26,800
Net cash flow: £94/mo
Cash on cash: 4.2%
Score at this price: 49

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.92 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 21017668Valuation edge · as of 12 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 6 comps, dispersion 15.7%Valuation edge · as of 21 Oct 2026
listing_factscontractual rent 660/mo (tenanted)Rental economics · as of 4 Nov 2026
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 4 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligence

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 132 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →flood, subsidence, crime, environment - the full domain

Plan

Before you offer

1. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£90,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£550

Gross Yield7.76%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.5%

5y Growth+1.9%

10y Growth+2.6%

Last Sold Price£72,500 (2023-03-17)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0HU5 1ND

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/01042/CONDET
Discharge of conditions for 26/00285/TPO - Works to trees covered by TPO no.302: Fell T1 ash due to poor form. Fell T2 ash monolith as already dead. Prune T3 ash by reducing westerly branch of main union fork by approx 4m to take the weight out of it, due to poor union fork being included. Prune T4 ash by reducing the branch growing over the telephone wires and seating area back past the fork to the regrowth point. (Revised description) - conditions 1
Pending
26/01031/TC
Works to trees
Pending
26/01018/CONDET
Discharge of conditions 26/00555/PAAD - Demolition of Blocks 3 (Former Boathouse) & 8 (Changing Pavilion) (Application to determine whether prior approval is required for the method of demolition and the reinstatement of the site) conditions 3 and 8
Pending

View Planning Timeline