47 Kirkham Drive, Hull, HU5 2BS

UPRN:21056090-Beds -Built 1900-1929

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band BEPC: E (50)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 1mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£152,000

£122k - £183kLow

Estimate

£152k

Range

£122k – £183k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

47 Kirkham Drive earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 71/100. Investment score 50/100 reflects below-average fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (56/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

71/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

50/ 100

Mixed

Crime Score

16/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

56/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 8Bike 69

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires valuation_edge (estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor)
headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Risk & liquidity9.2/15
653 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 40%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

listing_factslisting text signals condition works - budget before trusting any yieldRental economics · as of 4 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Valuation edge could not be scored
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Fill the valuation edge gap before relying on the score.
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
3. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
4. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£152,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.5%

5y Growth+1.9%

10y Growth+2.6%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0HU5 2BS

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/01045/TC
Fell x4 spruce trees in rear garden. (Works to trees in a Conservation Area)
Pending
26/01043/FULL
Internal and external alterations and proposed loft conversion to create additional living space, with rear facing dormer and roof lights.
Pending
26/01042/CONDET
Discharge of conditions for 26/00285/TPO - Works to trees covered by TPO no.302: Fell T1 ash due to poor form. Fell T2 ash monolith as already dead. Prune T3 ash by reducing westerly branch of main union fork by approx 4m to take the weight out of it, due to poor union fork being included. Prune T4 ash by reducing the branch growing over the telephone wires and seating area back past the fork to the regrowth point. (Revised description) - conditions 1
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership85%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

11 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£27,309

Population Density-

Owner Occupied70%

Age Distribution

0-15 13%16-64 53%65+ 34%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Sidmouth Primary School
0.4 mi
Good
Bricknell Primary School
0.4 mi
Area grades2025
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.
University of Hull
0.4 mi
-
Newland School for Girls
0.6 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.

3 of 11 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

53 Kirkham Drive
-
£108k
-
49 Kirkham Drive
-
£127k
-
41 Kirkham Drive
-
£91k
-
35 Kirkham Drive
-
£124k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN