Flat A, 568 Beverley Road, Hull, HU6 7LG

UPRN:21110019Flat/Maisonette4 bedsBuilt 1900-1929

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band AEPC: D (58)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

Flat A, 568 Beverley Road, Hull, HU6 7LG

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£122,000

£98k - £146kLow

Estimate

£122k

Range

£98k – £146k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£850

£800 - £900

Monthly

£850

Yield

4.08%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Flat A earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 79/100. Investment score 57/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is excellent (91/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

79/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

57/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

20/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

91/ 100

Excellent

Transit & Bike

Transit 26Bike 76

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires valuation_edge (estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor)

What we could establish

Rental economics0/40
gross yield 3.8% on contractual rent (listing-disclosed tenancy)
- listing_factscontractual rent 800/mo (tenanted)· as of 4 Nov 2026
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -597/mo, -75% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 4 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity9.4/15
239 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 39%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Economics

What happens to your money

Your assumptions

Purchase price£250,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£850/mo

Evidenced range £800-£900

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £78,800
Net cash flow: -£255/mo
Cash on cash: -3.9%
Score at this price: -

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.01 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

listing_factscontractual rent 800/mo (tenanted)Rental economics · as of 4 Nov 2026
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Valuation edge could not be scored
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
Seller motivation could not be scored
no listing-history inputs (first published date, price changes)

Property risk deep-dive →flood, subsidence, crime, environment - the full domain

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the valuation edge gap before relying on the score.
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
2. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£122,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£850

Gross Yield4.08%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+4.5%

5y Growth+4.4%

10y Growth+3.8%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseHigh

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0HU6 7LG

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/01042/CONDET
Discharge of conditions for 26/00285/TPO - Works to trees covered by TPO no.302: Fell T1 ash due to poor form. Fell T2 ash monolith as already dead. Prune T3 ash by reducing westerly branch of main union fork by approx 4m to take the weight out of it, due to poor union fork being included. Prune T4 ash by reducing the branch growing over the telephone wires and seating area back past the fork to the regrowth point. (Revised description) - conditions 1
Pending
26/01025/TC
Pollard x 1 Robinia tree in rear garden Remove dead wood and reduce height of x 1 Cedar by approx 4m (Works to trees in a Conservation Area)
Pending
26/01018/CONDET
Discharge of conditions 26/00555/PAAD - Demolition of Blocks 3 (Former Boathouse) & 8 (Changing Pavilion) (Application to determine whether prior approval is required for the method of demolition and the reinstatement of the site) conditions 3 and 8
Pending

View Planning Timeline