101 North Lane, Portslade, Brighton, BN41 2HH

UPRN:22006170Detached Bungalow2 bedsBuilt 1967-1975

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band CEPC: C (69)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 4mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

101 North Lane, Portslade, Brighton, BN41 2HH

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

2 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

20 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£389,000

£370k - £409kHigh

Estimate

£389k

Range

£370k – £409k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,850

£2k - £2k

Monthly

£1,850

Yield

5.69%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

101 North Lane earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 75/100. Investment score 56/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (55/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

75/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

56/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

6/ 100

Low

Walkability

55/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 23Bike 40

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 2 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM -0.3% (HIGH)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 12 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 22006170· as of 12 Oct 2026
Rental economics9.2/40
gross yield 6.2% on contractual rent (listing-disclosed tenancy)
- listing_factscontractual rent 2000/mo (tenanted)· as of 2 Nov 2026
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -305/mo, -15% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 2 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 174 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 2 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
200 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£292,500£448,500

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£390,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,850/mo

Evidenced range £1,700-£2,000

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £127,800
Net cash flow: -£35/mo
Cash on cash: -0.3%
Score at this price: 24

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.41 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 22006170Valuation edge · as of 12 Oct 2026
listing_factscontractual rent 2000/mo (tenanted)Rental economics · as of 2 Nov 2026
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 2 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 2 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 174 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →flood, subsidence, crime, environment - the full domain

Plan

Before you offer

1. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
2. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£389,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,850

Gross Yield5.69%

1y Growth+19.6%

3y Growth+0.0%

5y Growth+1.9%

10y Growth+2.8%

Last Sold Price£148,500 (2002-11-08)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonModerate
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0BN41 2HH

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

AWDM/1156/26
Application for Certificate of Lawfulness for hip to gable roof extension and rear dormer
Pending
SDNP/26/02537/ADJAUT
Adjoining Authority Consultation - Adur & Worthing - AWDM/0768/26 - Hip to gable roof extension, extension of front and rear dormers, extension of porch to front
Referred
AWDM/0733/26
Householder application for permitted development for prior approval for single storey pitch fringed flat roofed rear extension to property measuring 5m from rear wall of the original dwelling, maximum height 3.50m and height of eaves of the extension 3.00m.
Approved

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership68.6%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2002-11-08
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

7 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£33,506

Population Density5,917 /km²

Owner Occupied81%

Age Distribution

0-15 19%16-64 68%65+ 13%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Portslade Aldridge Community Academy
0.1 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Mile Oak Primary School
0.3 mi
Good
Hill Park School
0.4 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Peter Gladwin Primary School
0.4 mi
-

3 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

195 North Lane
-
£450k
-
119 North Lane
-
£358k
-
183 North Lane
-
£380k
-
189 North Lane
-
£383k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN