75 Larkfield Way, Brighton, BN1 8EG
UPRN:22077370Semi-Detached Bungalow3 bedsBuilt 1930-1949
FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band DEPC: D (66)
Data freshness:Price Paid· freshPrice Paid: fresh, refreshed 3d ago (2026-11-01T12:50:54.266673+00:00)Planning· 4mo agoPlanning: stale, refreshed 4mo ago (2026-07-10T08:08:53.340186+00:00)EPC· 6mo agoEPC: stale, refreshed 6mo ago (2026-05-20T10:58:39.129138+00:00)Risk· 5mo agoRisk: stale, refreshed 5mo ago (2026-06-18T00:00:00+00:00)Connectivity· 1mo agoConnectivity: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-10-03T06:43:10.905825+00:00)Schools· 1mo agoSchools: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-10-06T08:24:30.427161+00:00)Amenities· 1mo agoAmenities: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-09-23T00:00:00+00:00)Area· Census 2021Area: static reference data (Census 2021); authoritative and does not refreshCouncil Tax· 6mo agoCouncil Tax: stale, refreshed 6mo ago (2026-05-20T09:33:12.870431+00:00)
HP Score
78
/ 100
Strong
Verdict
3 days ago
- Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed
Evidence
18 of 21 sourcesSale Estimate
£610,000
£579k - £640kHigh
Estimate
£610k
Range
£579k – £640k
Rent Estimate (pcm)
£3,500
£3k - £4k
Monthly
£3,500
Yield
6.89%
Verdict
Derived from HomePortfolio scores
75 Larkfield Way earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 78/100. Investment score 63/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (53/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.
Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS
78
HP Score
78/ 100
Strong
63
Investment Score
63/ 100
Moderate
6
Crime Score
6/ 100
Low
53
Walkability
53/ 100
Moderate
Transit & Bike
Transit 32Bike 56
Walk Score, out of 100
Valuation & Market
Sale Estimate£610,000
Rent Estimate (pcm)£3,500
Gross Yield6.89%
1y Growth-
3y Growth-0.4%
5y Growth+0.7%
10y Growth+2.8%
Last Sold Price£237,500 (2003-02-13)
Risk Overview
- Flood RiskUnknown
- SubsidenceModerate
- RadonModerate
- MiningLow
- LandslideLow
- Air QualityLow
- NoiseLow
Planning Activity
Recent Apps
0BN1 8EG
Approval Rate
-12mo
Development
low
- PendingBH2026/00357beech - reduce entire tree by 2-2.5m
- PendingBH2026/00232Tree 1 - Sycamore (Tree No. 1): Fell to ground level. Reason: Small self-seeded tree adjacent to a post/column with branches growing into overhead telephone lines, creating ongoing conflict and safety risk. Tree 2 - Flowering Cherry (Tree No. 2, Tag 884): Fell to ground level. Reason: Tree in significant, immediate, and irreversible decline with basal decay; proximity to fencing and pedestrian areas presents a risk of failure. Tree 3 - Sycamore (Tree No. 3, Tag 861): Pollard to approximately 9m. Reason: Tree leans towards astroturf pitch and has a bifurcated stem with a cavity in the lower trunk. Pollarding will reduce loading and manage structural risk while retaining the tree. Tree 4 - Flowering Cherry (Tree No. 4, Tag 871): Fell to ground level. Reason: Heavily ivy-covered tree with significant basal decay adjacent to boundary fencing, presenting a foreseeable risk of failure. Ivy removal to adjacent trees excluded at client request. Tree 5 - Pissard's Plum (Tree No. 5): Re-coppice to approximately 1m. Reason: Multi-stemmed tree close to buildings and shelter, with branches in contact with structures. Works will reduce risk and allow controlled regrowth. Tree 6 - Field Maple (Tree No. 6): Selective reduction up to 1m on west side only. Reason: Young tree adjacent to a lamp column; pruning required to prevent contact and future conflict while maintaining a balanced crown. Tree 7 - Ash (Tree No. 7, Tag 886): Fell to ground level. Reason: Visible crack at base of trunk indicating structural weakness. Proximity to fencing and site use presents an unacceptable safety risk. Tree 8 - Horse Chestnut (Tree No. 8, Tag 888): Fell to ground level and remove timber. Reason: Dead standing tree located adjacent to main entrance and nearby residential property; removal required due to high-risk location. Tree 9 - Sycamore (Tree No. 9, Tag 62): Fell to ground level. Reason: Tree in overall decline with historic trunk damage, major deadwood, and structural weakn...
- PendingBH2026/00208To install telecommunications apparatus.
Ownership
- Corporate Ownership52.6%
- Overseas OwnershipNo
- Lease Term Remaining-
- CovenantsRestrictive
- Lease TypeFreehold
- Last Ownership Change2003-02-13
- SourceLand Registry
Connectivity
Broadband (Standard)
13 Mbps
Mobile 4G/5G Coverage
EEThreeO2Vodafone
EV Charger
-
PTAL Rating
-
Area Profile
Median EarningsLocal authority£33,506
Population Density-
Owner Occupied87%
Age Distribution
0-15 18%16-64 61%65+ 21%
Schools Nearby
- Varndean School0.4 miGood
- -Varndean College0.4 mi
- Balfour Primary School0.6 miGood
- Patcham High School0.6 miGood
3 of 9 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.
Comparables
- 81 Larkfield Way-£615k-
- 49 Larkfield Way-£535k-
- 63 Larkfield Way-£920k-
- 69 Larkfield Way-£1.04M-