Purbeck Lodge, Beach Road West, Portishead, Bristol, BS20 7HX

UPRN:24064949-Beds -Built 1967-1975

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band GEPC: C (73)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 3mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 4mo ago

Purbeck Lodge, Beach Road West, Portishead, Bristol, BS20 7HX

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£848,000

£763k - £933kMedium

Estimate

£848k

Range

£763k – £933k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Purbeck Lodge earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 72/100. Investment score 50/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (64/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

72/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

50/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

15/ 100

Low

Walkability

64/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 18Bike 33

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge-0.6/15
claims [AVM -17.3% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge -0.12pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; asking more than 10% above the estimate (measured -0.33pp)
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 12 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 24064949· as of 12 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity12.8/15
403 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 24064949Valuation edge · as of 12 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 2 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
2. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£848,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.4%

5y Growth+1.1%

10y Growth+3.0%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonModerate
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseBelow 40 dB

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0BS20 7HX

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/P/1988/S73
Section 73 application to vary condition number 3 on application 23/P/0786/FUH (Proposed replacement of the existing rear balcony with new raised balcony.) to allow for the removal of the eastern privacy screen.
Pending
26/P/1974/NMA
Non-Material Amendment to application 26/P/1491/FUH (Proposed erection of a single storey rear extension with balcony above and raised rear decking. Expansion of existing front hardstanding.) to allow for alteration to the wording of condition 4 (Privacy Screening).
Approved
26/P/1922/TPO
Dead Cherry Tree at the top of our garden. Crown will be felled to 4 feet high to provide a habitat.
Pending

View Planning Timeline