Apartment, 66, 60 Macfarlane Chase, Weston-super-Mare, BS23 3WG

UPRN:24121440Purpose Built Flat2 bedsBuilt 2003-2006

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: -EPC: B (82)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· freshRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

Apartment, 66, 60 Macfarlane Chase, Weston-super-Mare, BS23 3WG

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£162,000

£154k - £170kHigh

Estimate

£162k

Range

£154k – £170k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£750

£700 - £800

Monthly

£750

Yield

6.21%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Apartment earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 54/100. Investment score 59/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is elevated. Walkability is limited (62/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

54/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

59/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

90/ 100

Elevated

Walkability

62/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 21Bike 61

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence1 independent sourceLead to verifyListing checked 4 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Check before relying on this score: leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress test assumes GBP 0. It ranks after every home whose inputs are verified.

Valuation edge0.9/15
claims [AVM +10.5% (HIGH), sold-comps +1.4%, £/sqft +1.1%] → measured edge +0.18pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 24121440· as of 9 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 5.8%· as of 24 Oct 2026
Rental economics9/40
gross yield 6.2%; range width penalty ×0.93
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 750/mo (range 700-800)· as of 9 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -203/mo, -27% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; disclosed service charge and ground rent); fails the stress - earns nothing; leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress assumes GBP 0
- listing_factsservice charge / ground rent from the advert· as of 4 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 43 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 4 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.7/15
438 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£109,000£167,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£145,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£750/mo

Evidenced range £700-£800

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £45,200
Net cash flow: £30/mo
Cash on cash: 0.8%
Score at this price: 25

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.53 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 24121440Valuation edge · as of 9 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 5.8%Valuation edge · as of 24 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 750/mo (range 700-800)Rental economics · as of 9 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
listing_factsservice charge / ground rent from the advertStress margin · as of 4 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 750/mo (range 700-800)
Stress margin needs verification before you rely on it
service charge / ground rent from the advert

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£162,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£750

Gross Yield6.21%

1y Growth+6.6%

3y Growth+1.7%

5y Growth+1.1%

10y Growth+3.4%

Last Sold Price£108,000 (2015-01-15)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonLow
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0BS23 3WG

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/P/1980/FUH
Proposed erection of a two-storey side and single-storey rear extension.
Pending
26/P/1887/NMA
Non-Material Amendment to application 25/P/1746/FUL (Erection of 39no. dwellings with associated roads and parking following demolition of existing buildings) to allow for alterations to approved boundary treatment along the western boundary of the site.
Approved
26/P/1604/FUL
Retrospective change of use of Unit 4 from Use Class E (formerly Use Class B1(c) Industrial processes) for use as a garage service centre (Use Class B2)
Approved

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership65.3%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining132 yrs
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeLeasehold
Last Ownership Change2015-01-15
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (-)

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£32,996

Population Density3,146 /km²

Owner Occupied30%

Age Distribution

0-15 22%16-64 65%65+ 13%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Hans Price Academy
0.2 mi
Good
Bournville Primary School
0.3 mi
Area grades2025
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.
Haywood Village Academy
0.5 mi
-
Ashcombe Primary School
0.6 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.

1 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

148 Macfarlane Chase
-
£197k
-
140 Macfarlane Chase
-
£143k
-
16 Macfarlane Chase
-
£155k
-
120 Macfarlane Chase
-
£150k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN