Skip to property details

2 The Maples, Cleeve, Bristol, BS49 4FS

UPRN:24146106Detached House4 bedsBuilt -
FreeholdCouncil Tax: -EPC: -
Data freshness:Listing· freshListing: fresh, refreshed 6d ago (2026-11-02T04:00:05.857782+00:00)Planning· 2mo agoPlanning: ageing, refreshed 2mo ago (2026-09-19T06:50:46.145657+00:00)Risk· 5mo agoRisk: stale, refreshed 5mo ago (2026-06-18T00:00:00+00:00)Connectivity· 1mo agoConnectivity: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-10-03T06:43:10.905825+00:00)Schools· 1mo agoSchools: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-10-06T08:24:30.427161+00:00)Amenities· 2mo agoAmenities: ageing, refreshed 2mo ago (2026-09-23T00:00:00+00:00)Area· Census 2021Area: static reference data (Census 2021); authoritative and does not refresh
2 The Maples, Cleeve, Bristol, BS49 4FS

HP Score

Mixed
Verdict
3 days ago
  • Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.

    Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence
17 of 21 sources
Sale Estimate
--
-- - --
Rent Estimate (pcm)
--
-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

2 The Maples earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 68/100. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (25/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageHM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS
HP Score
68/ 100
Mixed
-
Investment Score
No data
Crime Score
20/ 100
Moderate
Walkability
25/ 100
Low
Transit & Bike
Transit 7Bike 21
Walk Score, out of 100

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate-
Rent Estimate (pcm)-
Gross Yield-
1y Growth-
3y Growth+0.3%
5y Growth+1.5%
10y Growth+3.1%
Last Sold Price£600,000 (2018-12-07)

Risk Overview

  • Flood RiskUnknown
  • SubsidenceLow
  • RadonModerate
  • MiningLow
  • LandslideLow
  • Air QualityLow
  • NoiseModerate

Planning Activity

Recent Apps
0BS49 4FS
Approval Rate
-12mo
Development
low
  • 26/P/0886/TPO
    Cedar of Lebanon (T2) Reduce length of exposed branch to east by 2.5m to reduce chance of failure onto power lines and stop domino effect of branch failure. (Figure 1) Reduce three lateral branches over building so they are not protruding from the canopy. Reduce in length by 2-3 m. (See figures 2, 3 &4 for branches to be pruned and figure 6 for approximate pruning line.) Prune the next layer of branches above these ( possibly while stood on the lower branches with pole loppers) to give 0.5- 1 m clearance of the 3 lower branches. This is so that the growth points on the lower branches are not shaded out. Cedar Of Lebanon (T3) Reduce 2-3 branches to the SE top of canopy on grounds of conserving the canopy of the tree. (See figure 9) Reasons: T2 had a tolerable risk rating although minor pruning works have still been recommended. The recent history of T2s branch loss, although not necessarily indicating the tree will continue to drop limbs, does mean that the wind dynamics through the crown of the tree could be altered slightly. Minor crown lifting to the west underneath the long lateral limbs over the house will also have altered wind dynamics as well as some of the recent local tree removals along the A370 to south. Although these combined traits are not indicating a high probability of failure, the high occupancy of the building below (bedroom for two people with an occupancy of likely 2 people for 10 hours over a 24 hour period) and the size of branches that could fail give the overall risk rating as tolerable rather than acceptable. Reducing these three lower lateral limbs by 2-3 m into the line of the rest of the canopy would bring risk into the broadly acceptable regions. It is recommended that the next row of branches above these be tipped back from the growth on the ends of the pruned lateral branches by reducing 0.5-1m in places this is just so that the pruned branches below are not shaded out and can continue to grow. These lateral branches are important
    Approved
  • 26/P/0480/NMA
    Non-Material Amendment to application 24/P/2574/FUL (Proposed conversion of existing barn to 1no. residential annexe and 1no. hobby/ leisure room all to be used in connection with the main dwelling 'Brockley Elm Farm') to allow for the addition of 2no. rooflights to the South roof.
    Approved
  • 26/P/0375/LBC
    Listed Building Consent for the conversion of existing barn to form a residential annexe and a hobby/leisure room, to be used in connection with the main dwelling. Installation of PV panels and 2no. rooflights to south elevation roof.
    Approved

Ownership

  • Corporate Ownership69%
  • Overseas OwnershipNo
  • Lease Term Remaining-
  • CovenantsRestrictive
  • Lease TypeFreehold
  • Last Ownership Change2018-12-07
  • SourceLand Registry

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)
13 Mbps
Mobile 4G/5G Coverage
EEThreeO2Vodafone
EV Charger
-
PTAL Rating
-

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£32,996
Population Density-
Owner Occupied90%
Age Distribution
0-15 16%16-64 56%65+ 28%

Schools Nearby

  • Court-De-Wyck Church School
    1.1 mi
    Good
  • West Leigh Infant School
    1.6 mi
    Good
  • Backwell Church of England Junior School
    1.9 mi
    Area grades2024

    Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.

  • Backwell School
    2.0 mi
    Good

2 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

Comparables

View All
  • 5B The Maples
    -
    £510k
    -
  • 4 The Maples
    -
    £525k
    -
  • Sycamore, 1 The Maples
    -
    £600k
    -
  • Ivyleaf, 2 The Maples
    -
    £600k
    -