36 Ruskin Road, New Costessey, Norwich, NR5 0LL

UPRN:2630108592-Beds -Built 1950-1966

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band CEPC: D (65)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 3mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 4mo ago

36 Ruskin Road, New Costessey, Norwich, NR5 0LL

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

17 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£350,000

£315k - £385kMedium

Estimate

£350k

Range

£315k – £385k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

36 Ruskin Road earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 77/100. Investment score 60/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (55/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

77/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

60/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

6/ 100

Low

Walkability

55/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 25Bike 50

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +7.1% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 2630108592· as of 13 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity12.8/15
249 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 2630108592Valuation edge · as of 13 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 3 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£350,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth+8.3%

3y Growth-3.9%

5y Growth+0.1%

10y Growth+2.3%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningSignificant
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseBelow 40 dB

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

1NR5 0LL

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/01072/F
First floor dormer extension.
Pending
2026/2709
Construction of a single-storey rear extension, construction of a new garage for parking and storage and Installation of a rear flat-roof dormer extension
Pending
2026/2618
Proposed single storey side extension, loft conversion and 1.5 storey rear extension.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership82.5%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

4 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£32,934

Population Density2,742 /km²

Owner Occupied90%

Age Distribution

0-15 12%16-64 55%65+ 33%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Banks House School
0.3 mi
Outstanding
Costessey Primary School
0.4 mi
Good
Clover Hill VA Infant and Nursery School
0.5 mi
Inspected as Clover Hill Infant School and Nursery (URN 120992) on 17 Feb 2011
Valley Primary Academy
0.7 mi
Inspected as Valley Primary Academy (URN 142818) on 6 Jun 2023

2 of 10 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

22 Ruskin Road
-
£308k
-
24 Ruskin Road
-
£238k
-
44 Ruskin Road
-
£280k
-
1A Ruskin Road
-
£335k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN