Jasmine Cottage Nogdam End, Low Road, Norton Subcourse, Norwich, NR14 6SE

UPRN:2630132695Detached House2 bedsBuilt 1900-1929

FreeholdCouncil Tax: -EPC: G (19)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· 1mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

Jasmine Cottage Nogdam End, Low Road, Norton Subcourse, Norwich, NR14 6SE

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£471,000

£447k - £495kHigh

Estimate

£471k

Range

£447k – £495k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,750

£2k - £2k

Monthly

£1,750

Yield

4.42%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Jasmine Cottage Nogdam End earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 58/100. Investment score 50/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (0/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

58/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

50/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

6/ 100

Low

Walkability

0/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 34Bike 30

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 4 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM -0.8% (HIGH)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 2630132695· as of 9 Nov 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 4.4%; range width penalty ×0.80
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1750/mo (range 1600-1950)· as of 9 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -848/mo, -48% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 4 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 46 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 4 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
300 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£356,000£546,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£475,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,750/mo

Evidenced range £1,600-£1,950

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £157,550
Net cash flow: -£392/mo
Cash on cash: -3.0%
Score at this price: 15

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.09 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 2630132695Valuation edge · as of 9 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1750/mo (range 1600-1950)Rental economics · as of 9 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 4 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1750/mo (range 1600-1950)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 46 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£471,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,750

Gross Yield4.42%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-0.5%

5y Growth-0.6%

10y Growth+3.3%

Last Sold Price£240,000 (2016-06-03)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0NR14 6SE

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

BA/2025/0182/FOREST
Felling and replanting , restocking with mixed broadleaves and conifer where appropriate. This is due to ash dieback disease, acute oak decline and sooty bark disease of sycamore.
Approved
BA/2021/0508/CPLUD
Lawful Development Certificate for a replacement Pumping Station. The works constitute development by a drainage body (Waveney, Lower Yare and Lothingland Internal Drainage Board) to improve and repair land drainage works (Norton Pumping Station).
Approved
BA/2021/0160/FUL
Conversion of barn and outbuildings to annex accommodation.
Conditions

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership74.2%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2016-06-03
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

8 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£32,934

Population Density67 /km²

Owner Occupied82%

Age Distribution

0-15 16%16-64 59%65+ 25%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Avocet House
1.7 mi
Good
Reedham Primary School
1.8 mi
Inspected as Reedham Primary School (URN 120844) on 5 Jun 2019
Thurlton Primary School
1.8 mi
Good
Hobart High School
2.6 mi
Good

1 of 11 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

Jasmine Cottage Nogdam End
-
£240k
-
Jasmine Cottage Nogdam End
-
£290k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN