King Inas Palace, Silver Street, South Petherton, TA13 5BY

UPRN:30051984Semi-Detached House4 bedsBuilt before 1900

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band EEPC: D (59)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 3mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

King Inas Palace, Silver Street, South Petherton, TA13 5BY

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

17 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

-- - --

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

King Inas Palace earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 71/100. Crime intensity is moderate. Walkability is limited (60/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageHM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

71/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

No data

Crime Score

41/ 100

Elevated

Walkability

60/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 11Bike 29

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge0/15
claims [sold-comps -17.1%, £/sqft -17.1%] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; AVM excluded (no market estimate available)
no market estimate available · snapshot 10 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 15.8%· as of 5 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity9/15
52 sales/12mo in area
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 15.8%Valuation edge · as of 5 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
2. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate-

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth-5.2%

5y Growth+0.9%

10y Growth+3.2%

Last Sold Price£725,000 (2024-06-24)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonModerate
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

1TA13 5BY

Approval Rate

100%12mo

Development

low

26/02571/TCA
Notification of intent to carry out tree surgery works to No.01 tree (Norway Maple) within a Conservation Area. Reduce canopy by 30%. Branch and stem lengths to be removed, would be no more than 3m.
Pending
26/02508/DOC1
Discharge of Conditions No.09 (lighting) and No.13 (BEP) of planning application 18/03739/FUL
Pending
26/02459/TCA
Notification of intent to fell No. 1 Field maple tree and carry out tree surgery works to No. 1 Hornbeam within a conservation area. T1 - Field maple, 3.6m in height, This application is to remove the tree and favour the hornbeam. T2 - Hornbeam, 3.6m in height. Reduce to 3m and balance the crown.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership81%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2024-06-24
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

17 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£29,908

Population Density-

Owner Occupied60%

Age Distribution

0-15 17%16-64 52%65+ 31%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

South Petherton Church of England Infants and Pre School
0.2 mi
Area grades2024
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.
South Petherton Junior School
0.5 mi
Area grades2025
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.
Kingsbury Episcopi Primary School
1.8 mi
Good
Shepton Beauchamp Church School
1.9 mi
Area grades2024
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.

0 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

King Inas Palace Silver Street
-
£725k
-
Kingaby Cottage Silver Street
-
£275k
-
King Inas Palace Silver Street
-
£635k
-
Kingaby Cottage Silver Street
-
£259k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN