11 Arundel Lodge, Pegasus Court, Tilehurst, Reading, RG31 5DB

UPRN:310020291Flat/Maisonette1 bedsBuilt 1996-2002

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band DEPC: C (76)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 3mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

11 Arundel Lodge, Pegasus Court, Tilehurst, Reading, RG31 5DB

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£178,000

£169k - £187kHigh

Estimate

£178k

Range

£169k – £187k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£950

£900 - £1k

Monthly

£950

Yield

6.91%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

11 Arundel Lodge earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 81/100. Investment score 68/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (61/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

81/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

68/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

5/ 100

Low

Walkability

61/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 34Bike 29

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence1 independent sourceListing checked 5 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [AVM +7.3% (HIGH), sold-comps +14.5%, £/sqft +14.5%] → measured edge +0.50pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 310020291· as of 13 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 23.4%· as of 19 Oct 2026
Rental economics15.1/40
gross yield 6.9%; range width penalty ×0.99
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 950/mo (range 900-1000)· as of 13 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -360/mo, -38% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; disclosed service charge and ground rent); fails the stress - earns nothing
- listing_factsservice charge / ground rent from the advert· as of 5 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 92 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 5 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
266 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£124,000£189,500

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£165,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£950/mo

Evidenced range £900-£1,000

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £51,600
Net cash flow: £101/mo
Cash on cash: 2.3%
Score at this price: 32

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.71 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 310020291Valuation edge · as of 13 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 23.4%Valuation edge · as of 19 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 950/mo (range 900-1000)Rental economics · as of 13 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
listing_factsservice charge / ground rent from the advertStress margin · as of 5 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 5 Nov 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 950/mo (range 900-1000)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 92 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
3. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£178,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£950

Gross Yield6.91%

1y Growth+10.3%

3y Growth+0.0%

5y Growth+2.5%

10y Growth+1.8%

Last Sold Price£165,000 (2024-02-16)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningSignificant
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseBelow 40 dB

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0RG31 5DB

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

PL/26/1406
The installation of 1no. new power generator, 1no. new equipment cabinet and associated ancillary works thereto.
Rejected
PL/26/1361
Construction of a 2.7m wide dropped kerb and removal of traffic bollard to provide a vehicle crossing point from School Road onto a new off-street parking space for a single car within the front garden to enable off-street EV charging.
Pending
26/02228/TPW
T1 Oak - Fell and treat stump with eco-plugs
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership72.9%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining114 yrs
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeLeasehold
Last Ownership Change2024-02-16
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

19 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£35,454

Population Density5,104 /km²

Owner Occupied86%

Age Distribution

0-15 19%16-64 57%65+ 24%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Birch Copse Primary School
0.1 mi
Outstanding
St Paul's Catholic Primary School
0.2 mi
Good
Park Lane Primary School
0.2 mi
Good
Springfield Primary School
0.3 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.

4 of 11 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

Oakwood Cottages Pegasus Court
-
£304k
-
Berkshire Lodge Pegasus Court
-
£230k
-
Cumberland Lodge Pegasus Court
-
£260k
-
Cumberland Lodge Pegasus Court
-
£146k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN