Skip to property details

Entrance at Rear of 475, 475A Hartshill Road, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 6AA

UPRN:3455046906-Beds -Built before 1900
Tenure: -Council Tax: -EPC: D (59)
Data freshness:Listing· freshListing: fresh, refreshed 2d ago (2026-11-04T04:00:06.345886+00:00)Price Paid· freshPrice Paid: fresh, refreshed 4d ago (2026-11-01T13:20:31.841033+00:00)Planning· 5mo agoPlanning: stale, refreshed 5mo ago (2026-06-23)EPC· 6mo agoEPC: stale, refreshed 6mo ago (2026-05-20T10:58:39.129138+00:00)Risk· 5mo agoRisk: stale, refreshed 5mo ago (2026-06-18T00:00:00+00:00)Connectivity· 1mo agoConnectivity: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-10-03T06:43:10.905825+00:00)Schools· 2mo agoSchools: ageing, refreshed 2mo ago (2026-09-06T16:32:37.982054+00:00)Amenities· 1mo agoAmenities: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-09-23T00:00:00+00:00)Area· Census 2021Area: static reference data (Census 2021); authoritative and does not refresh
Entrance at Rear of 475, 475A Hartshill Road, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 6AA

HP Score

Strong
Verdict
today
  • Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.

    Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence
19 of 21 sources
Sale Estimate
£143,000
£115k - £172kLow
Estimate
£143k
Range
£115k – £172k
Rent Estimate (pcm)
--
-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Entrance at Rear of 475 earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 82/100. Investment score 70/100 reflects strong fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is good (77/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS
HP Score
82/ 100
Strong
Investment Score
70/ 100
High
Crime Score
15/ 100
Low
Walkability
77/ 100
High
Transit & Bike
Transit 15Bike 48
Walk Score, out of 100

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£143,000
Rent Estimate (pcm)-
Gross Yield-
1y Growth-
3y Growth+3.9%
5y Growth+1.3%
10y Growth+2.9%
Last Sold Price£68,000 (2003-03-11)

Risk Overview

  • Flood RiskUnknown
  • SubsidenceLow
  • RadonModerate
  • MiningLow
  • LandslideModerate
  • Air QualityLow
  • NoiseLow

Planning Activity

Recent Apps
0ST4 6AA
Approval Rate
-12mo
Development
low
  • 26/00735/FUL
    Replacement of existing single glazed sash timber windows with new double glazed timber sash windows on ground and first floor, fronting Lower Oxford Road.
    Pending
  • 26/00757/TWA
    T1 Lime Removal. On the grounds that the tree is causing damage to the neighbouring wall and is physically encroaching into a residents garden. These issues raise concerns regarding the protection of neighbouring property, the ongoing impact on the residents enjoyment and use of their garden, and the potential for further damage if the tree is retained. The trees proximity to the boundary and its apparent impact on the neighbouring wall suggest that its continued retention may be causing an unreasonable level of interference with the adjacent property. If the damage is ongoing, retaining the tree could result in further deterioration and increased repair costs. Removal would eliminate the source of the encroachment and allow the affected wall and boundary area to be repaired and maintained without continued interference from the tree. Furthermore, the trees encroachment into a residents garden affects the residents ability to enjoy and use their outdoor space without obstruction. The impact on neighbouring amenity and property should therefore be given due consideration when assessing whether the tree remains suitable for retention in its current location. On balance, removal of T1 Lime should be considered a reasonable and proportionate solution, subject to confirmation of the damage, the extent of the encroachment and an assessment of any alternative management options. Where the damage cannot be adequately resolved through pruning or other arboricultural measures, removal may be the most effective long-term means of preventing further interference with the neighbouring property.
    Pending
  • 26/00698/FUL
    Proposed loft conversion with new rear dormer and roof lights to front elevation.
    Pending

Ownership

  • Corporate Ownership69.2%
  • Overseas OwnershipNo
  • Lease Term Remaining-
  • CovenantsRestrictive
  • Lease Type-
  • Last Ownership Change2003-03-11
  • SourceLand Registry

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)
14 Mbps
Mobile 4G/5G Coverage
EEThreeO2Vodafone
EV Charger
-
PTAL Rating
-

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£29,041
Population Density4,291 /km²
Owner Occupied67%
Age Distribution
0-15 15%16-64 64%65+ 21%

Schools Nearby

  • Harpfield Primary Academy
    0.1 mi

    Inspected as Harpfield Primary School (URN 123998) on 14 Jun 2011

  • Newcastle-under-Lyme School
    0.3 mi
    Inspected by ISI
  • Lyme Brook Independent School
    0.4 mi
    Good
  • Demetae Academy
    0.5 mi
    Inspected by ISI

1 of 10 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

Comparables

View All
  • 471 Hartshill Road
    -
    £50k
    -
  • 463 Hartshill Road
    -
    £125k
    -
  • 471 Hartshill Road
    -
    £83k
    -
  • 489 Hartshill Road
    -
    £140k
    -