60 Boxley Road, Chatham, ME5 9LJ

UPRN:44043154-Beds -Built -

Tenure: -Council Tax: -EPC: -

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 4mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

17 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£340,000

£306k - £374kMedium

Estimate

£340k

Range

£306k – £374k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

60 Boxley Road earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 77/100. Investment score 58/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (61/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

77/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

58/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

8/ 100

Low

Walkability

61/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 14Bike 50

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge-0.6/15
claims [AVM -252.9% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge -0.12pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; asking more than 10% above the estimate (measured -0.33pp)
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 10 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 44043154· as of 10 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity12.8/15
536 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 44043154Valuation edge · as of 10 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
2. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£340,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth+1.4%

5y Growth+2.5%

10y Growth+3.3%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonModerate
MiningSignificant
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0ME5 9LJ

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/503652/FULL
Demolition of the existing conservatory and erection of a single storey rear flat roof extension including 1no. rooflight.
Pending
26/503920/TPOA
TPO Application to remove one (T1) Douglas Fir Tree and to also remove one (T2) European Lach Tree
Pending
26/503923/TPOA
Tree Preservation Order Application: T1 Cherry - Reduce tree all over by 3m - Crown Height from 18m to 15m - Crown Spread from 12m to 9m - due to over extended limbs to decrease risk of limb failure, T2 Hornbeam - Reduce tree all over by 4m - Crown Height from 12m to 8m - Crown Spread from 10m to 6m - reduce due to substantial lean towards property, reducing risk of tree uprooting. T3 Ash - Remove tree down to ground level - Crown Height 12m - Crown Spread 4m - remove tree due to signs of ash die back being present and tree being a low quality specimen, T4 Ash - Remove tree down to ground level - Crown Height 12m - Crown Spread 4m - remove tree due to signs of ash die back being present, tree being a low quality specimen and having substantial lean towards property.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership75.1%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

9 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£33,857

Population Density3,925 /km²

Owner Occupied87%

Age Distribution

0-15 17%16-64 60%65+ 23%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Walderslade Primary School
0.4 mi
GoodImproving
Tunbury Primary School
0.4 mi
Good
Lordswood School
0.5 mi
Area grades2025
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.
St Benedict's Catholic Primary School
0.7 mi
-

3 of 11 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

75 Boxley Road
-
£588k
-
65 Boxley Road
-
£295k
-
63 Boxley Road
-
£325k
-
65 Boxley Road
-
£200k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN