45 Regency Apartments, Citadel East, Killingworth, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE12 6DL

UPRN:47222774Purpose Built Flat2 bedsBuilt 2003-2006

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band AEPC: B (82)

Data freshness:Price Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 4mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

45 Regency Apartments, Citadel East, Killingworth, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE12 6DL

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£83,000

£79k - £87kHigh

Estimate

£83k

Range

£79k – £87k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£600

£550 - £600

Monthly

£600

Yield

9.00%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

45 Regency Apartments earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 78/100. Investment score 74/100 reflects strong fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is good (77/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

78/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

74/ 100

High

Crime Score

33/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

77/ 100

High

Transit & Bike

Transit 23Bike 61

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Reduced confidence2 independent sourcesListing checked 30 Oct 2026

Fewer independent sources agree, or a component could not be scored.

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [AVM +3.6% (HIGH), sold-comps +14.0%, £/sqft +14.4%] → measured edge +0.50pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 47222774· as of 9 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 7 comps, dispersion 20.9%· as of 24 Oct 2026
Rental economics32/40
gross yield 9.0%; range width penalty ×1.00
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 600/mo (range 550-600)· as of 9 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -27/mo, -4% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 30 Oct 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 267 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 30 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity14.7/15
384 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£60,000£92,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£80,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£600/mo

Evidenced range £550-£600

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £25,300
Net cash flow: £145/mo
Cash on cash: 6.9%
Score at this price: 49

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 2.22 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 47222774Valuation edge · as of 9 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 7 comps, dispersion 20.9%Valuation edge · as of 24 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 600/mo (range 550-600)Rental economics · as of 9 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 30 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 30 Oct 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is reduced
fewer independent sources agree, or a component could not be scored
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 600/mo (range 550-600)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 267 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£83,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£600

Gross Yield9.00%

1y Growth+8.3%

3y Growth+3.3%

5y Growth+2.5%

10y Growth+2.5%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0NE12 6DL

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/01538/FULH
Retrospective replacement of existing timber framed windows and external doors with uPVC frames and a composite front door
Pending
26/01426/TREECA
Cherry tree - to be removed
Pending
26/01357/TREECA
Acer Platanoides - Crown lift to 3m for pedestrian clearance. Crown lift to 5.2m for highway clearance
Approved

View Planning Timeline