Flat F, 22 Priory Road, London, NW6 4SG

UPRN:5114457-Beds -Built 1900-1929

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band EEPC: C (78)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 1mo agoEPC· 4mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

20 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£671,000

£537k - £805kLow

Estimate

£671k

Range

£537k – £805k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Flat F earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 62/100. Investment score 62/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is elevated. Walkability is good (83/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

62/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

62/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

73/ 100

Elevated

Walkability

83/ 100

High

Transit & Bike

Transit 88Bike 68

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires valuation_edge (estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor)
headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Risk & liquidity9.3/15
457 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 40%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Valuation edge could not be scored
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the valuation edge gap before relying on the score.
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£671,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.1%

5y Growth-0.8%

10y Growth+0.0%

Last Sold Price£331,400 (2003-03-05)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

1NW6 4SG

Approval Rate

100%12mo

Development

low

26/2769
T1. Sycamore (Acer psuedoplatanus) Rear garden Large mature tree dominating rear garden and overhanging adjacent gardens. Snapped branches throughout canopy, and squirrel damage on new growth. Previously reduced 4 years ago. Reduce canopy to previous points of reduction (3m in height and 2m in lateral spread) to maintain cyclical pruning and improve light into surrounding areas.
Pending
26/07378/TCA
T1: Magnolia (8m): Crown reduce by 1m and crown thin by 15% to keep tree at a size suitable for its location and as part of regular maintenance T2: Ginkgo (9m): Reduce height by 2m to keep tree at a size suitable for its location and as part of regular maintenance
Pending
26/2706
Details pursuant to condition 3 (Details of relocation of the veterinary partition screen), of Listed Building Consent application reference 25/1213 dated 14/04/2026 for Listed Building Consent for proposed conversion into a 7 bedroom 7 person house in multiple occupation (HMO) together with a rear extension at first floor level, roof garden and alteration to rear and side elevations to premises
Pending

View Planning Timeline