3.6, Pulse Apartments, 52 Lymington Road, London, NW6 1HQ

UPRN:5136484-Beds -Built 2003-2006

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band GEPC: B (84)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 4mo ago

3.6, Pulse Apartments, 52 Lymington Road, London, NW6 1HQ

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

20 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£1,116,000

£1.00M - £1.23MMedium

Estimate

£1.12M

Range

£1.00M – £1.23M

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

3.6 earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 62/100. Investment score 74/100 reflects strong fundamentals. Crime intensity is elevated. Walkability is excellent (96/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

62/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

74/ 100

High

100

Crime Score

100/ 100

Elevated

Walkability

96/ 100

Excellent

Transit & Bike

Transit 90Bike 71

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge-0.6/15
claims [AVM -21.0% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge -0.12pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; asking more than 10% above the estimate (measured -0.33pp)
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 9 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 5136484· as of 9 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity12.8/15
457 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 5136484Valuation edge · as of 9 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
2. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£1,116,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.1%

5y Growth-0.8%

10y Growth+0.0%

Last Sold Price£1,196,000 (2022-07-28)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseHigh

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0NW6 1HQ

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

2026/4825/T
FRONT GARDEN: 1 x Ash (T1) - Reduce back to holistic reduction points, (3m) in order to prevent failure of branches over public footpath and communal gardens. 1 x Plum & 1 x Amelanchier (G1) - Reduce back to previous pruning points, (1m -1.5m) in order to prevent overhang over public footpath and excessive shading to lower ground windows of property. REAR GARDEN: (T2) Indian Bean - Reduce overhang over the garages by up to 3m in order to prevent failure of tree or branches. 4 x Laurel (G2) - Trim lateral spread by up to 0.5m and reduce height by approx. 1m to prevent excessive shading to rear of property.
Pending
2026/4818/T
REAR GARDEN: 1 x Lime (T1) - Reduce to previous, most recent pruning points, (approx. 2m - 3m).
Pending
2026/4123/P
Replacement of entrance lobby.
Pending

View Planning Timeline