Skip to property details

Flat 3, 162 Fairbridge Road, London, N19 3HU

UPRN:5300032562Converted Flat2 bedsBuilt 1900-1929
LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band DEPC: D (61)
Data freshness:Listing· 3mo agoListing: stale, refreshed 3mo ago (2026-07-26T04:00:02.045797+00:00)Price Paid· freshPrice Paid: fresh, refreshed 5d ago (2026-11-01T14:03:52.134228+00:00)Planning· 2mo agoPlanning: ageing, refreshed 2mo ago (2026-09-20T06:55:00.000223+00:00)EPC· 6mo agoEPC: stale, refreshed 6mo ago (2026-05-20T10:58:39.129138+00:00)Risk· 5mo agoRisk: stale, refreshed 5mo ago (2026-06-18T00:00:00+00:00)Connectivity· 1mo agoConnectivity: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-10-03T06:43:10.905825+00:00)Schools· 1mo agoSchools: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-10-06T08:24:30.427161+00:00)Amenities· 1mo agoAmenities: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-09-23T00:00:00+00:00)Area· Census 2021Area: static reference data (Census 2021); authoritative and does not refreshCouncil Tax· 6mo agoCouncil Tax: stale, refreshed 6mo ago (2026-05-20T09:33:12.870431+00:00)
Flat 3, 162 Fairbridge Road, London, N19 3HU

HP Score

Strong
Verdict
yesterday
  • Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.

    Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence
20 of 21 sources
Sale Estimate
£538,000
£511k - £565kHigh
Estimate
£538k
Range
£511k – £565k
Rent Estimate (pcm)
£2,350
£2k - £3k
Monthly
£2,350
Yield
5.24%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Flat 3 earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 85/100. Investment score 71/100 reflects strong fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is excellent (94/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS
HP Score
85/ 100
Strong
Investment Score
71/ 100
High
Crime Score
12/ 100
Low
Walkability
94/ 100
Excellent
Transit & Bike
Transit 56Bike 74
Walk Score, out of 100

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£538,000
Rent Estimate (pcm)£2,350
Gross Yield5.24%
1y Growth-
3y Growth+0.5%
5y Growth+1.3%
10y Growth+1.6%
Last Sold Price£89,950 (1996-10-04)

Risk Overview

  • Flood RiskUnknown
  • SubsidenceSignificant
  • RadonLow
  • MiningUnknown
  • LandslideLow
  • Air QualityLow
  • NoiseLow

Planning Activity

Recent Apps
1N19 3HU
Approval Rate
-12mo
Development
low
  • HGY/2026/2994
    T1: Lime Tree (Tilia species) – Located on the rear boundary line at the southwest corner of the building. PROPOSED WORKS: Fell to ground level (complete removal) and grind out stump. 1. Structural Hazard to Adjacent Window Bay: The tree exhibits a severe, unnatural trunk lean angled directly toward the adjacent residential window bay. During high wind events, dynamic sail-loading (compounded by heavy ivy) creates continuous leverage on the slender trunk, posing an imminent risk of failure into habitable rooms. 2. Inadequacy of Previous Pruning (Ref: HGY/2026/2273): Approval under HGY/2026/2273 pruned branches to 2m clearance, but failed to resolve the primary hazard: the structural lean of the main trunk toward the windows. 3. Documented Branch Failures & Active Structural Instability: The tree has a documented history of branch failure, with fallen branches already recorded on site. This active shedding demonstrates structural weakness within the crown canopy, which—when combined with heavy foliage and dense ivy—creates dynamic sail-loading and excessive leverage on an already leaning trunk. 4. Structural Hazard & Direct Proximity: The severe, unnatural trunk lean is angled directly toward the adjacent residential window bay. Given the history of branch drop and the trunk’s angle, high wind events pose an imminent, unacceptable risk of major structural failure into habitable rooms. 5. Request for Site Visit: Report HGY/2026/2273 noted no site visit was conducted. An in-person assessment is requested to evaluate the trunk angle and structural proximity to the window bay. 6. Low Amenity: The tree is not publicly visible and holds minimal amenity value relative to the risk to adjacent windows. While pollarding or pruning was previously considered, it is no longer a viable or safe solution for this specific tree. Previous pruning (Ref: HGY/2026/2273) failed to address the core problem: a severe, fundamental structural lean of the main trunk directly toward the residential window bay. Pruning does not correct root plate instability or prevent the leaning trunk from failing under heavy wind loads. We actively welcome and request an in-person site visit by a Haringey Tree Officer to verify the severe trunk angle and structural risk to the window bay, addressing previous concerns regarding assessments (if applicable).
    Pending
  • P2026/2860/TRE
    Pear - Crown reduce the height approx. 30cm below the previous reduction points (approx. 1.0m) Crown reduce the spread to balance and shape (approx. 0.5m) Apple - Crown reduce the height approx. 30cm below the previous reduction points (approx. 1.0m) Crown reduce the spread to balance and shape (approx. 0.5m) Pear - Crown reduce the height approx. 30-40cm below the previous reduction points (approx. 1.8m) Crown reduce the spread to balance and shape (approx. 1.0m) Maintenance works in line with good arboricultural practice
    Pending
  • HGY/2026/2965
    T1 - Bay - ( Laurus nobilis. ) - Felling bay to ground level + treating stump to prevent regrowth.
    Pending

Ownership

  • Corporate Ownership65.3%
  • Overseas OwnershipNo
  • Lease Term Remaining-
  • CovenantsRestrictive
  • Lease TypeLeasehold
  • Last Ownership Change1996-10-04
  • SourceLand Registry

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)
15 Mbps
Mobile 4G/5G Coverage
EEThreeO2Vodafone
EV Charger
-
PTAL Rating
-

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£47,411
Population Density17,820 /km²
Owner Occupied22%
Age Distribution
0-15 14%16-64 73%65+ 13%

Schools Nearby

  • City of London Academy, Highgate Hill
    0.1 mi
    Good
  • The Bridge Keystone
    0.1 mi
    Good
  • Duncombe Primary School
    0.1 mi
    Good
  • Margaret McMillan Nursery School
    0.3 mi
    Report card2026

    Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.

3 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

Comparables

View All
  • 124 Fairbridge Road
    -
    £1.20M
    -
  • 162 Fairbridge Road
    -
    £465k
    -
  • 140 Fairbridge Road
    -
    £1.11M
    -
  • 164 Fairbridge Road
    -
    £395k
    -