15 Jessop Court, 99 Graham Street, London, N1 8LG

UPRN:5300036926Flat/Maisonette3 bedsBuilt 1967-1975

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band DEPC: C (71)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 4mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

15 Jessop Court, 99 Graham Street, London, N1 8LG

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£582,000

£466k - £699kLow

Estimate

£582k

Range

£466k – £699k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£2,900

£3k - £3k

Monthly

£2,900

Yield

16.57%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

15 Jessop Court earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 66/100. Investment score 70/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is elevated. Walkability is excellent (86/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

66/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

70/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

73/ 100

Elevated

Walkability

86/ 100

Excellent

Transit & Bike

Transit 69Bike 74

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

listing is 'Sold subject to contract' - sale already progressing, not an actionable opportunity
estimate implies a 64% discount - beyond plausibility (gate 50%); suspected unit/basis mismatch, not a realisable edge

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Economics

What happens to your money

Your assumptions

Purchase price£210,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£2,900/mo

Evidenced range £2,700-£3,150

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £66,000
Net cash flow: £1,299/mo
Cash on cash: 23.6%
Score at this price: -

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 4.09 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion

Property risk deep-dive →flood, subsidence, crime, environment - the full domain

Plan

Before you offer

1. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£582,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£2,900

Gross Yield16.57%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-1.3%

5y Growth-0.6%

10y Growth+0.5%

Last Sold Price£230,000 (2002-11-15)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0N1 8LG

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

P2026/2907/TRE
T1: Robinia (Robinia pseudoacacia) - Reduce the overall crown height and lateral spread by approximately 2 metres, selectively pruning back to suitable live growth points. Carefully reshape and balance the remaining canopy to achieve a uniform, well-proportioned finish, retaining healthy furnishing growth on all aspects of the crown. Particular care is to be taken to maintain the tree's natural character and established branch structure, avoiding excessive pruning or unnecessary internal thinning. Reason for works: General tree maintenance, allowing more light into the property.
Pending
P2026/2894/TRE
My client would like to reduce a Sycamore (T1) by removing 4m branch length. Their reason is to maintain it's size in relation to the small garden and space it is growing in.
Pending
P2026/2870/LBC
Replacement of 2x windows, installation of 9x solar panels, ASHP and associated external works. Internal alterations to include reconfiguration of third floor plan [Full Planinng P2026/2869/FUL also submitted].
Pending

View Planning Timeline