1 Handa Walk, London, N1 2RF

UPRN:5300039752-Beds -Built 1967-1975

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band CEPC: D (62)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 1mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£483,000

£387k - £580kLow

Estimate

£483k

Range

£387k – £580k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

1 Handa Walk earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 81/100. Investment score 63/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is excellent (89/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

81/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

63/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

12/ 100

Low

Walkability

89/ 100

Excellent

Transit & Bike

Transit 78Bike 78

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires valuation_edge (estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor)
headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Risk & liquidity9.2/15
633 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 40%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

listing_factslisting text signals condition works - budget before trusting any yieldRental economics · as of 3 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 3 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Valuation edge could not be scored
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Fill the valuation edge gap before relying on the score.
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
3. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
4. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£483,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth-1.3%

5y Growth-0.6%

10y Growth+0.5%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0N1 2RF

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

P2026/2882/TRE
T7-Cedar Rear-Remove deadwood and reduce x overlong lateral branch by 2-3m. T8-Holly-rear left-Growing below Cedar T7. Reduce in height by approx. 3m where growing into Cedar tree. Shape to balance and contain.
Pending
P2026/2883/TRE
T1 - Cypress - Reduce height by 3m, shape side growth by up to 1m. Crown lift by 1m. this tree is growing in a raised border with limited room for growth either above or below ground.
Pending
P2026/2876/TRE
T1 - Norway Maple - Reduce height by up to 2.5 m, side growth by 1-2m., back to living growth points to create a natural crown shape. Remove dead branches. Crown lift by 1m Reasons for work -safety grounds the tree has considerable die back in the upper crown and some signs of decay/structural weakness
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership43.2%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining171 yrs
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

15 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£47,411

Population Density-

Owner Occupied38%

Age Distribution

0-15 17%16-64 71%65+ 12%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

St Paul's Waldorf School
0.2 mi
Inspected by ISI
Samuel Rhodes MLD School
0.2 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
City of London Academy Highbury Grove
0.3 mi
Good
North Bridge House Senior Canonbury School
0.3 mi
Inspected by ISI

3 of 9 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

17 Handa Walk
-
£485k
-
38 Handa Walk
-
£500k
-
38 Handa Walk
-
£500k
-
21 Handa Walk
-
£550k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN