Skip to property details

Flat F, 51 Hargrave Park, London, N19 5JW

UPRN:5300040757-Beds -Built 1900-1929
Tenure: -Council Tax: Band EEPC: D (57)
Data freshness:Listing· 7mo agoListing: stale, refreshed 7mo ago (2026-04-20T03:21:57.314853+00:00)Price Paid· freshPrice Paid: fresh, refreshed 6d ago (2026-11-01T14:03:52.134228+00:00)Planning· 4mo agoPlanning: stale, refreshed 4mo ago (2026-07-10T09:44:33.557915+00:00)EPC· 4mo agoEPC: stale, refreshed 4mo ago (2026-07-01T02:04:50.057738+00:00)Risk· 5mo agoRisk: stale, refreshed 5mo ago (2026-06-18T00:00:00+00:00)Connectivity· 1mo agoConnectivity: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-10-03T06:43:10.905825+00:00)Schools· freshSchools: fresh, refreshed 2d ago (2026-11-05T17:42:09.721250+00:00)Amenities· 2mo agoAmenities: ageing, refreshed 2mo ago (2026-09-23T00:00:00+00:00)Area· Census 2021Area: static reference data (Census 2021); authoritative and does not refreshCouncil Tax· 6mo agoCouncil Tax: stale, refreshed 6mo ago (2026-05-20T09:33:12.870431+00:00)
Flat F, 51 Hargrave Park, London, N19 5JW

HP Score

Strong
Verdict
yesterday
  • Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.

    Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence
18 of 21 sources
Sale Estimate
£1,334,000
£1.07M - £1.60MLow
Estimate
£1.33M
Range
£1.07M – £1.60M
Rent Estimate (pcm)
--
-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Flat F earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 77/100. Investment score 67/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is moderate. Walkability is excellent (94/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS
HP Score
77/ 100
Strong
Investment Score
67/ 100
Moderate
Crime Score
37/ 100
Elevated
Walkability
94/ 100
Excellent
Transit & Bike
Transit 82Bike 79
Walk Score, out of 100

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£1,334,000
Rent Estimate (pcm)-
Gross Yield-
1y Growth-
3y Growth+0.5%
5y Growth+1.3%
10y Growth+1.6%
Last Sold Price-

Risk Overview

  • Flood RiskUnknown
  • SubsidenceSignificant
  • RadonLow
  • MiningUnknown
  • LandslideLow
  • Air QualityLow
  • NoiseLow

Planning Activity

Recent Apps
0N19 5JW
Approval Rate
-12mo
Development
low
  • 2026/4879/T
    DD 5 Day Notice REAR GARDEN: 1 x Walnut (T1) - Fell to ground level.
    Pending
  • 2026/4887/T
    DD 5 Day Notice REAR GARDEN: 1 x Mimosa (T1) - Fell to ground level.
    Pending
  • HGY/2026/2994
    T1: Lime Tree (Tilia species) – Located on the rear boundary line at the southwest corner of the building. PROPOSED WORKS: Fell to ground level (complete removal) and grind out stump. 1. Structural Hazard to Adjacent Window Bay: The tree exhibits a severe, unnatural trunk lean angled directly toward the adjacent residential window bay. During high wind events, dynamic sail-loading (compounded by heavy ivy) creates continuous leverage on the slender trunk, posing an imminent risk of failure into habitable rooms. 2. Inadequacy of Previous Pruning (Ref: HGY/2026/2273): Approval under HGY/2026/2273 pruned branches to 2m clearance, but failed to resolve the primary hazard: the structural lean of the main trunk toward the windows. 3. Documented Branch Failures & Active Structural Instability: The tree has a documented history of branch failure, with fallen branches already recorded on site. This active shedding demonstrates structural weakness within the crown canopy, which—when combined with heavy foliage and dense ivy—creates dynamic sail-loading and excessive leverage on an already leaning trunk. 4. Structural Hazard & Direct Proximity: The severe, unnatural trunk lean is angled directly toward the adjacent residential window bay. Given the history of branch drop and the trunk’s angle, high wind events pose an imminent, unacceptable risk of major structural failure into habitable rooms. 5. Request for Site Visit: Report HGY/2026/2273 noted no site visit was conducted. An in-person assessment is requested to evaluate the trunk angle and structural proximity to the window bay. 6. Low Amenity: The tree is not publicly visible and holds minimal amenity value relative to the risk to adjacent windows. While pollarding or pruning was previously considered, it is no longer a viable or safe solution for this specific tree. Previous pruning (Ref: HGY/2026/2273) failed to address the core problem: a severe, fundamental structural lean of the main trunk directly toward the residential window bay. Pruning does not correct root plate instability or prevent the leaning trunk from failing under heavy wind loads. We actively welcome and request an in-person site visit by a Haringey Tree Officer to verify the severe trunk angle and structural risk to the window bay, addressing previous concerns regarding assessments (if applicable).
    Pending

Ownership

  • Corporate Ownership65.3%
  • Overseas OwnershipNo
  • Lease Term Remaining-
  • CovenantsRestrictive
  • Lease Type-
  • Last Ownership Change-
  • SourceLand Registry

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)
11 Mbps
Mobile 4G/5G Coverage
-
EV Charger
-
PTAL Rating
-

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£47,411
Population Density-
Owner Occupied25%
Age Distribution
0-15 15%16-64 75%65+ 10%

Schools Nearby

  • Hargrave Park School
    0.0 mi
    Good
  • Brookfield Primary School
    0.2 mi
    Good
  • Wildwood Nature School
    0.3 mi
    Inspected by ISI
  • St John's Upper Holloway CofE Primary School
    0.3 mi
    Report card2026

    Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.

5 of 11 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

Comparables

View All
  • 85 Hargrave Park
    -
    £1.50M
    -
  • 79 Hargrave Park
    -
    £1.06M
    -
  • 57B Hargrave Park
    -
    £592k
    -
  • 47B Hargrave Park
    -
    £615k
    -