191 Salisbury Walk, London, N19 5DX

UPRN:5300081101Purpose Built Flat2 bedsBuilt 1967-1975

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band CEPC: C (78)

Data freshness:Planning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoCrime· freshConnectivity· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£423,000

£381k - £465kMedium

Estimate

£423k

Range

£381k – £465k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,800

£2k - £2k

Monthly

£1,800

Yield

4.97%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

191 Salisbury Walk earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 80/100. Investment score 74/100 reflects strong fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is excellent (93/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

80/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

74/ 100

High

Crime Score

24/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

93/ 100

Excellent

Transit & Bike

Transit 92Bike 72

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesLead to verifyListing checked 9 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Check before relying on this score: leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress test assumes GBP 0. It ranks after every home whose inputs are verified.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM -2.8% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 14 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 5300081101· as of 14 Nov 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 5.0%; range width penalty ×0.92
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1800/mo (range 1700-1950)· as of 14 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -642/mo, -36% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing; leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress assumes GBP 0
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 9 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 67 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 9 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity12.9/15
186 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£326,000£500,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£435,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,800/mo

Evidenced range £1,700-£1,950

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £143,550
Net cash flow: -£222/mo
Cash on cash: -1.9%
Score at this price: 13

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.23 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 5300081101Valuation edge · as of 14 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1800/mo (range 1700-1950)Rental economics · as of 14 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 9 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 9 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1800/mo (range 1700-1950)
Stress margin needs verification before you rely on it
costs not disclosed by the advert

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£423,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,800

Gross Yield4.97%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.5%

5y Growth+1.3%

10y Growth+1.6%

Last Sold Price£185,000 (2005-04-22)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0N19 5DX

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

HGY/2026/3088
T1 Sycamore of the submitted MWA Arboricultural Report Works: Remove (fell) to near ground level and treat stump to inhibit regrowth. TG1 Elder and Holly Group of the submitted MWA Arboricultural Report Works: Remove (fell) to near ground level and treat stumps to inhibit regrowth. TG3 Mixed spp. group of mostly Purple-leaved Plum, Elder and Viburnum with Mahonia and Holly of the submitted MWA Arboricultural Report Works: Remove (fell) all except managed shrubs to near ground level and treat stumps to inhibit regrowth. Maintain currently managed shrubs at broadly no larger than current dimensions by periodic pruning. Reason: Clay shrinkage subsidence damage at the subject property.
Pending
2026/4977/T
REAR GARDEN: 1 x Holm Oak (T1) - Fell to ground level.
Pending
2026/4929/T
REAR GARDEN: 1 x Oak (T1) - Reduce crown back to suitable growth points with a height reduction of circa 1.25m - 1.75m, and lateral spread by 2m. All works will be undertaken in accordance with BS 39982010 - Tree Work - Recommendations.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership65.1%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining173 yrs
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeLeasehold
Last Ownership Change2005-04-22
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

7 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£47,411

Population Density17,046 /km²

Owner Occupied18%

Age Distribution

0-15 22%16-64 66%65+ 12%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Hargrave Park School
0.1 mi
Good
St Joseph's Catholic Primary School
0.2 mi
Outstanding
Brookfield Primary School
0.2 mi
Good
St Aloysius' College
0.3 mi
Inspected as St Aloysius RC College (URN 100459) on 7 Jun 2022

4 of 10 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

210 Salisbury Walk
-
£323k
-
190 Salisbury Walk
-
£470k
-
185 Salisbury Walk
-
£306k
-
204 Salisbury Walk
-
£482k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN