43 Kingsway Gardens, Ossett, WF5 8BX

UPRN:63189121Purpose Built Flat1 bedsBuilt 2012-2021

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band AEPC: D (67)

Data freshness:Price Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 3mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 4mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

20 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£106,000

£101k - £111kHigh

Estimate

£106k

Range

£101k – £111k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

43 Kingsway Gardens earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 80/100. Investment score 71/100 reflects strong fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (63/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

80/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

71/ 100

High

Crime Score

11/ 100

Low

Walkability

63/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 51Bike 20

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +5.7% (HIGH)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 63189121· as of 9 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity14.7/15
237 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 9%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 63189121Valuation edge · as of 9 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 28 Oct 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£106,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.1%

5y Growth+2.9%

10y Growth+4.2%

Last Sold Price£107,500 (2021-07-30)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonModerate
MiningUnknown
LandslideSignificant
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0WF5 8BX

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

2026/92309
Erection of two storey side extension
Pending
26/01457/FUL
Retrospective application for siting an InPost Parcel Locker
Pending
26/01372/FUL
First floor extension with associated internal and external alterations to facilitate conversion of existing unit to class E (e) commercial space
Approved

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership68.8%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining113 yrs
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeLeasehold
Last Ownership Change2021-07-30
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

9 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£29,954

Population Density3,924 /km²

Owner Occupied81%

Age Distribution

0-15 18%16-64 58%65+ 24%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Gawthorpe Community Academy
0.2 mi
Good
Orchard Primary Academy
0.5 mi
Good
Highfield School
0.6 mi
Good
Ossett Holy Trinity CofE VA Primary School
0.7 mi
Area grades2024
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.

1 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

17 Kingsway Gardens
-
£130k
-
23 Kingsway Gardens
-
£140k
-
37 Kingsway Gardens
-
£134k
-
8 Kingsway Gardens
-
£275k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN