Flat 58, Candy Wharf, 22 Copperfield Road, London, E3 4RL

UPRN:6364225Flat/Maisonette2 bedsBuilt 2007 onwards

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band DEPC: C (78)

Data freshness:Price Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

Flat 58, Candy Wharf, 22 Copperfield Road, London, E3 4RL

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

20 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£562,000

£534k - £590kHigh

Estimate

£562k

Range

£534k – £590k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£2,950

£3k - £3k

Monthly

£2,950

Yield

6.56%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Flat 58 earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 70/100. Investment score 74/100 reflects strong fundamentals. Crime intensity is elevated. Walkability is excellent (93/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

70/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

74/ 100

High

Crime Score

73/ 100

Elevated

Walkability

93/ 100

Excellent

Transit & Bike

Transit 70Bike 82

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesLead to verifyListing checked 4 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Check before relying on this score: leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress test assumes GBP 0. It ranks after every home whose inputs are verified.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +3.9% (HIGH)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 6364225· as of 9 Oct 2026
Rental economics11.1/40
gross yield 6.6%; range width penalty ×0.89
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 2950/mo (range 2750-3200)· as of 9 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -240/mo, -8% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing; leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress assumes GBP 0
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 4 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 167 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 4 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
439 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£405,000£621,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£540,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£2,950/mo

Evidenced range £2,750-£3,200

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £180,300
Net cash flow: £220/mo
Cash on cash: 1.5%
Score at this price: 26

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.62 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 6364225Valuation edge · as of 9 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 2950/mo (range 2750-3200)Rental economics · as of 9 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 4 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 2950/mo (range 2750-3200)
Stress margin needs verification before you rely on it
costs not disclosed by the advert

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£562,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£2,950

Gross Yield6.56%

1y Growth+15.7%

3y Growth+0.8%

5y Growth-1.1%

10y Growth+0.2%

Last Sold Price£605,000 (2017-10-06)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0E3 4RL

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

PA/26/01804/NC
Replacement of 6 casement windows (single and double glazed) with new timber casements and slim double glazing; refurbishment of 4 traditional sash windows, including new sashes and slim double glazing.
Pending
PA/26/01537
Renewal of all existing aluminium windows with new aluminium windows, together with the replacement of the existing external front and rear doors with timber doors.
Pending
PA/26/01799/NC
T1 Lime Tree - Fell (Stump to remain) - it has become too large for the garden and is causing excessive shading.
Pending

View Planning Timeline