3 Cross Row, Swillington Common, Leeds, LS15 4LD

UPRN:72389594-Beds -Built -

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band BEPC: -

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 4mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

3 Cross Row, Swillington Common, Leeds, LS15 4LD

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

16 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£188,000

£169k - £206kMedium

Estimate

£188k

Range

£169k – £206k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

3 Cross Row earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 58/100. Investment score 53/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is moderate. Walkability is limited (31/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

58/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

53/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

50/ 100

Elevated

Walkability

31/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 14Bike 45

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +4.3% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 12 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 72389594· as of 12 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity12.9/15
361 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 72389594Valuation edge · as of 12 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 2 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£188,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth+12.1%

3y Growth+2.0%

5y Growth+2.9%

10y Growth+4.5%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0LS15 4LD

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/06136/COND
Consent agreement or approval of condition 15 (muck) and 16 (contractors) of planning application 18/05310/FU
Pending
26/05065/COND
Consent, agreement or approval required by conditions 14 (Car Park and Servicing Management Plan) and 15 (Car Parking Monitoring Plan) of planning application 24/07415/FU
Pending
26/03210/TR
T1 and T2 Horse Chestnut and T8 Sycamore: See attached statement
Approved

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership61.7%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

12 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£31,679

Population Density-

Owner Occupied78%

Age Distribution

0-15 15%16-64 57%65+ 28%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Colton Primary School
0.7 mi
Outstanding
Austhorpe Primary School
0.8 mi
Good
Strawberry Fields Primary School
1.1 mi
Inspected as Strawberry Fields Primary School (URN 134405) on 6 Mar 2019
Garforth Academy
1.2 mi
Area grades2024
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.

3 of 15 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

2 Cross Row
-
£170k
-
10 Middle Row
-
£185k
-
8 Middle Row
-
£165k
-
6 Middle Row
-
£102k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN