Kushgar, Acacia Park Crescent, Bradford, BD10 0PJ

UPRN:72527002Detached House6 bedsBuilt 1930-1949

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band GEPC: D (61)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 3mo agoEPC· 3mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 3mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

Kushgar, Acacia Park Crescent, Bradford, BD10 0PJ

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

17 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£1,243,000

£1.18M - £1.31MHigh

Estimate

£1.24M

Range

£1.18M – £1.31M

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£7,300

£7k - £8k

Monthly

£7,300

Yield

7.30%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Kushgar earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 69/100. Investment score 61/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (21/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

69/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

61/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

12/ 100

Low

Walkability

21/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 15Bike 15

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Reduced confidence2 independent sourcesListing checked 4 Nov 2026

Fewer independent sources agree, or a component could not be scored.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +3.5% (HIGH)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 12 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 72527002· as of 12 Oct 2026
Rental economics17/40
gross yield 7.3%; range width penalty ×0.93
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 7300/mo (range 6800-7800)· as of 12 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin2.4/30
stressed cash flow +173/mo, +2% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); passes the stress
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 4 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 197 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 4 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
356 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£900,000£1,380,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£1,200,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£7,300/mo

Evidenced range £6,800-£7,800

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £425,050
Net cash flow: £1,004/mo
Cash on cash: 2.8%
Score at this price: 34

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.80 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 72527002Valuation edge · as of 12 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 7300/mo (range 6800-7800)Rental economics · as of 12 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 4 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is reduced
fewer independent sources agree, or a component could not be scored
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 7300/mo (range 6800-7800)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 197 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
3. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£1,243,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£7,300

Gross Yield7.30%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-0.0%

5y Growth+2.3%

10y Growth+2.2%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonModerate
MiningLow
LandslideSignificant
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

2BD10 0PJ

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/05914/TR
T1 Wych Elm: Fell the tree to ground level. T2 Mature Ash: Fell or pollard See Application for additional information.
Pending
26/05623/TR
5 Day notice - G1 Group of 14 Trees with Canker - Deadwood all trees, Pollard 1 Sycamore and 2 Chestnut due to failures limbs fracturing
Approved
26/05576/TR
T1 Horse Chestnut: Remove the north east facing limb to just above the previous wound caused by a branch failure on the east side at around 4.5m high. The branches above this wound showed poor vitality throughout the summer with signs of die back
Approved

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership74.8%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

13 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£31,679

Population Density636 /km²

Owner Occupied81%

Age Distribution

0-15 20%16-64 59%65+ 21%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Woodhouse Grove School
0.4 mi
Inspected by ISI
Rawdon Littlemoor Primary School
0.8 mi
Good
Benton Park School
1.0 mi
Inspected as Benton Park School (URN 108083) on 25 Oct 2023
Greengates Primary Academy
1.1 mi
Good

4 of 14 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

Mount Grove Acacia Park Crescent
-
£745k
-
Acacia Point Acacia Park Crescent
-
£1.40M
-
Windrush Acacia Park Crescent
-
£1.00M
-
Cobble Court Acacia Park Crescent
-
£775k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN