Skip to property details

1 Northern Heights, Crescent Road, London, N8 8AS

UPRN:100021170478Purpose Built Flat1 bedsBuilt 1950-1966
LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band CEPC: D (64)
Data freshness:Listing· 3mo agoListing: stale, refreshed 3mo ago (2026-07-27T02:31:05.073725+00:00)Price Paid· freshPrice Paid: fresh, refreshed 6d ago (2026-11-01T02:12:50.361098+00:00)Planning· 4mo agoPlanning: stale, refreshed 4mo ago (2026-07-10T08:18:09.318969+00:00)EPC· 6mo agoEPC: stale, refreshed 6mo ago (2026-05-20T10:58:39.129138+00:00)Risk· 5mo agoRisk: stale, refreshed 5mo ago (2026-06-18T00:00:00+00:00)Connectivity· 1mo agoConnectivity: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-10-03T06:43:10.905825+00:00)Schools· freshSchools: fresh, refreshed yesterday (2026-11-05T17:42:09.721250+00:00)Amenities· 2mo agoAmenities: ageing, refreshed 2mo ago (2026-09-23T00:00:00+00:00)Area· Census 2021Area: static reference data (Census 2021); authoritative and does not refreshCouncil Tax· 5mo agoCouncil Tax: stale, refreshed 5mo ago (2026-06-08T12:57:15.890812+00:00)
1 Northern Heights, Crescent Road, London, N8 8AS

HP Score

Strong
Verdict
yesterday
  • Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.

    Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence
18 of 21 sources
Sale Estimate
£434,000
£412k - £456kHigh
Estimate
£434k
Range
£412k – £456k
Rent Estimate (pcm)
£1,700
£2k - £2k
Monthly
£1,700
Yield
4.70%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

1 Northern Heights earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 80/100. Investment score 74/100 reflects strong fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is excellent (85/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS
HP Score
80/ 100
Strong
Investment Score
74/ 100
High
Crime Score
30/ 100
Moderate
Walkability
85/ 100
Excellent
Transit & Bike
Transit 49Bike 72
Walk Score, out of 100

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£434,000
Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,700
Gross Yield4.70%
1y Growth-
3y Growth+0.8%
5y Growth+0.4%
10y Growth+0.2%
Last Sold Price£385,000 (2015-07-17)

Risk Overview

  • Flood RiskUnknown
  • SubsidenceSignificant
  • RadonLow
  • MiningUnknown
  • LandslideLow
  • Air QualityLow
  • NoiseLow

Planning Activity

Recent Apps
0N8 8AS
Approval Rate
-12mo
Development
low
  • HGY/2026/3034
    Five Day Notice. T1 Weeping Ash at the rear of the Town Hall which has multiple weak points including bracket fungus and decayed sections. Manage potential sudden failure by removing the end section as per photos.
    Pending
  • HGY/2026/3032
    Large Oak - Crown reduce the low to mid spread growing towards South-East, South and South-West by branches of up to 2.5m keeping the natural canopy outline. Crown thin by 20% and remove major dead wood. Maintenance works in line with good arboricultural practice
    Pending
  • HGY/2026/2994
    T1: Lime Tree (Tilia species) – Located on the rear boundary line at the southwest corner of the building. PROPOSED WORKS: Fell to ground level (complete removal) and grind out stump. 1. Structural Hazard to Adjacent Window Bay: The tree exhibits a severe, unnatural trunk lean angled directly toward the adjacent residential window bay. During high wind events, dynamic sail-loading (compounded by heavy ivy) creates continuous leverage on the slender trunk, posing an imminent risk of failure into habitable rooms. 2. Inadequacy of Previous Pruning (Ref: HGY/2026/2273): Approval under HGY/2026/2273 pruned branches to 2m clearance, but failed to resolve the primary hazard: the structural lean of the main trunk toward the windows. 3. Documented Branch Failures & Active Structural Instability: The tree has a documented history of branch failure, with fallen branches already recorded on site. This active shedding demonstrates structural weakness within the crown canopy, which—when combined with heavy foliage and dense ivy—creates dynamic sail-loading and excessive leverage on an already leaning trunk. 4. Structural Hazard & Direct Proximity: The severe, unnatural trunk lean is angled directly toward the adjacent residential window bay. Given the history of branch drop and the trunk’s angle, high wind events pose an imminent, unacceptable risk of major structural failure into habitable rooms. 5. Request for Site Visit: Report HGY/2026/2273 noted no site visit was conducted. An in-person assessment is requested to evaluate the trunk angle and structural proximity to the window bay. 6. Low Amenity: The tree is not publicly visible and holds minimal amenity value relative to the risk to adjacent windows. While pollarding or pruning was previously considered, it is no longer a viable or safe solution for this specific tree. Previous pruning (Ref: HGY/2026/2273) failed to address the core problem: a severe, fundamental structural lean of the main trunk directly toward the residential window bay. Pruning does not correct root plate instability or prevent the leaning trunk from failing under heavy wind loads. We actively welcome and request an in-person site visit by a Haringey Tree Officer to verify the severe trunk angle and structural risk to the window bay, addressing previous concerns regarding assessments (if applicable).
    Pending

Ownership

  • Corporate Ownership55.3%
  • Overseas OwnershipNo
  • Lease Term Remaining999+ yrs
  • CovenantsNone
  • Lease TypeLeasehold
  • Last Ownership Change2015-07-17
  • SourceLand Registry

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)
18 Mbps
Mobile 4G/5G Coverage
-
EV Charger
-
PTAL Rating
-

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£37,563
Population Density8,758 /km²
Owner Occupied35%
Age Distribution
0-15 15%16-64 70%65+ 15%

Schools Nearby

  • Coleridge Primary School
    0.1 mi
    Area grades2025

    Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.

  • Whitehall Park School
    0.3 mi
    Good
  • Ashmount Primary School
    0.3 mi
    Good
  • Margaret McMillan Nursery School
    0.3 mi
    Report card2026

    Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.

3 of 9 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

Comparables

View All
  • Northern Heights Crescent Road
    -
    £425k
    -
  • Northern Heights Crescent Road
    -
    £205k
    -
  • Northern Heights Crescent Road
    -
    £460k
    -
  • Northern Heights Crescent Road
    -
    £450k
    -