29 Northern Heights, Crescent Road, London, N8 8AS

UPRN:100021170509Purpose Built Flat1 bedsBuilt 1930-1949

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band CEPC: C (72)

Data freshness:Planning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 5mo ago

29 Northern Heights, Crescent Road, London, N8 8AS

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

2 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£432,000

£411k - £454kHigh

Estimate

£432k

Range

£411k – £454k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,700

£2k - £2k

Monthly

£1,700

Yield

5.10%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

29 Northern Heights earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 80/100. Investment score 77/100 reflects strong fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is excellent (85/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

80/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

77/ 100

High

Crime Score

30/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

85/ 100

Excellent

Transit & Bike

Transit 49Bike 72

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesLead to verifyListing checked 4 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Check before relying on this score: leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress test assumes GBP 0. It ranks after every home whose inputs are verified.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +7.4% (HIGH)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100021170509· as of 9 Nov 2026
Rental economics0.7/40
gross yield 5.1%; range width penalty ×0.85
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1700/mo (range 1550-1850)· as of 9 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -568/mo, -33% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing; leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress assumes GBP 0
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 4 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Seller motivationNot scored
no listing-history inputs (first published date, price changes)
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
336 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£300,000£460,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£400,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,700/mo

Evidenced range £1,550-£1,850

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £131,300
Net cash flow: -£173/mo
Cash on cash: -1.6%
Score at this price: 15

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.26 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100021170509Valuation edge · as of 9 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1700/mo (range 1550-1850)Rental economics · as of 9 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 4 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1700/mo (range 1550-1850)
Stress margin needs verification before you rely on it
costs not disclosed by the advert

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£432,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,700

Gross Yield5.10%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.8%

5y Growth+0.4%

10y Growth+0.2%

Last Sold Price£400,000 (2022-09-15)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0N8 8AS

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

HGY/2026/2417
Retrospective retention of existing air-conditioning plant
Pending
HGY/2026/3045
- T1 Bay: reduce height by up to 3.5m and crown spread to the south, east and west by up to 1m, then trim annually to maintain. - T7 Ash: reduce height by up to 2m and radial crown spread by up to 1.5m. - T8 Smokebush (Cotinus): reduce by up to 40%, height by up to 2m.
Pending
HGY/2026/3035
T1) Eucalyptus: fell to ground level. Insurance company have stipulated this needs to happen due to subsidence.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership55.2%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining58 yrs
CovenantsNone
Lease TypeLeasehold
Last Ownership Change2022-09-15
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

19 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£37,563

Population Density8,758 /km²

Owner Occupied35%

Age Distribution

0-15 15%16-64 70%65+ 15%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Coleridge Primary School
0.1 mi
Area grades2025
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.
Whitehall Park School
0.3 mi
Good
Ashmount Primary School
0.3 mi
Good
Margaret McMillan Nursery School
0.3 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.

3 of 9 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

Northern Heights Crescent Road
-
£425k
-
Northern Heights Crescent Road
-
£205k
-
Northern Heights Crescent Road
-
£460k
-
Northern Heights Crescent Road
-
£450k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN