4 Marquis Court, 4 Anglesea Road, Kingston upon Thames, KT1 2EN

UPRN:100021753627-Beds -Built 1976-1982

Tenure: -Council Tax: -EPC: C (79)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 3mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

4 Marquis Court, 4 Anglesea Road, Kingston upon Thames, KT1 2EN

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

20 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£484,000

£436k - £532kMedium

Estimate

£484k

Range

£436k – £532k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

4 Marquis Court earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 69/100. Investment score 57/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is moderate. Walkability is good (70/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

69/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

57/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

42/ 100

Elevated

Walkability

70/ 100

High

Transit & Bike

Transit 46Bike 63

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM -3.3% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 10 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100021753627· as of 10 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity12.9/15
184 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 100021753627Valuation edge · as of 10 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 3 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
2. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£484,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth-8.6%

5y Growth+0.6%

10y Growth+1.0%

Last Sold Price£165,000 (1999-10-22)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0KT1 2EN

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/02309/NMA
Application for a Non-Material Amendment to Planning Permission ref: 25/01574/FUL (Change of use from care home (Use Class C2) to a large House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) providing specialist supported accommodation for vulnerable individuals (Use Class Sui Generis), including associated external alterations, changes to fenestration, provision of refuse storage, vehicle and cycle parking, landscaping and plant). Amendment to relocate the refuse and recycling store.
Pending
26/02289/NMA
Application for a Non-Material Amendment to Planning Permission ref: 19/01788/FUL (Change of Use from News Agents (Use Class A1) to Cafe (Use Class A3) with associated internal alterations). Amendment relates to the extraction fan equipment specification, with no proposed alterations to the approved external duct configuration or discharge position.
Pending
26/02272/TCA
T1: Tree of Heaven - Fell.
Pending

View Planning Timeline