Flat 33, Sledge Tower, Dalston Square, London, E8 3GT

UPRN:10008325149Purpose Built Flat1 bedsBuilt 2012 onwards

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band CEPC: C (77)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

Flat 33, Sledge Tower, Dalston Square, London, E8 3GT

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£442,000

£420k - £464kHigh

Estimate

£442k

Range

£420k – £464k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,950

£2k - £2k

Monthly

£1,950

Yield

5.51%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Flat 33 earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 64/100. Investment score 72/100 reflects strong fundamentals. Crime intensity is elevated. Walkability is excellent (94/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

64/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

72/ 100

High

100

Crime Score

100/ 100

Elevated

Walkability

94/ 100

Excellent

Transit & Bike

Transit 86Bike 78

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesLead to verifyListing checked 6 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Check before relying on this score: leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress test assumes GBP 0. It ranks after every home whose inputs are verified.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +3.8% (HIGH)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10008325149· as of 9 Nov 2026
Rental economics3.6/40
gross yield 5.5%; range width penalty ×0.89
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1950/mo (range 1800-2100)· as of 9 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -490/mo, -25% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing; leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress assumes GBP 0
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 6 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 301 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 6 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
256 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£319,000£488,500

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£425,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,950/mo

Evidenced range £1,800-£2,100

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £140,050
Net cash flow: -£84/mo
Cash on cash: -0.7%
Score at this price: 18

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.36 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10008325149Valuation edge · as of 9 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1950/mo (range 1800-2100)Rental economics · as of 9 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 6 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 6 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1950/mo (range 1800-2100)
Stress margin needs verification before you rely on it
costs not disclosed by the advert

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
3. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£442,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,950

Gross Yield5.51%

1y Growth-22.2%

3y Growth-1.6%

5y Growth+0.2%

10y Growth+0.9%

Last Sold Price£470,000 (2016-08-04)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0E8 3GT

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

P2026/2813/FUL
ground floor single storey rear extension
Pending
P2026/2745/AOD
Approval of details pursuant to the discharge of Conditions 3.b 3.c 3.d 3.e 3.f and 4 of planning permission reference: P2025/3057/LBC Dated 11/05/2026
Pending
P2026/2713/TRE
T1 - Sycamore Stem diameter at 1.5m above ground level was measured as 640mm. Crown is heavily asymmetrical following the northern side overhang being completely removed by the neighbour back to the boundary line, Crown overhangs roofs to the south. The extreme asymmetry of the crown will have the effect of shifting the centre of mass away from the vertical axis of the trunk. The alteration in biomechanics caused by the action of the neighbour will have increased the probability of the tree failing during high winds and/or snow loading. Weather events such as these are more likely to occur within the next 6 months than the period since the operation was undertaken. Option 1 Fell as close as possible to ground level Apply eco plugs
Pending

View Planning Timeline