Flat 112, Coppermill Heights, 2 Daneland Walk, London, N17 9FF

UPRN:10022943045Purpose Built Flat1 bedsBuilt 2007-2011

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band BEPC: C (78)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 4mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· freshAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

Flat 112, Coppermill Heights, 2 Daneland Walk, London, N17 9FF

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£323,000

£307k - £339kHigh

Estimate

£323k

Range

£307k – £339k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,650

£2k - £2k

Monthly

£1,650

Yield

6.60%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Flat 112 earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 61/100. Investment score 68/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is elevated. Walkability is good (83/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

61/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

68/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

87/ 100

Elevated

Walkability

83/ 100

High

Transit & Bike

Transit 80Bike 68

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesLead to verifyListing checked 6 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Check before relying on this score: leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress test assumes GBP 0. It ranks after every home whose inputs are verified.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +7.1% (HIGH)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10022943045· as of 9 Oct 2026
Rental economics11.5/40
gross yield 6.6%; range width penalty ×0.90
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1650/mo (range 1550-1800)· as of 9 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -183/mo, -11% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing; leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress assumes GBP 0
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 6 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 247 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 6 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.7/15
305 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£225,000£345,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£300,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,650/mo

Evidenced range £1,550-£1,800

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £96,300
Net cash flow: £130/mo
Cash on cash: 1.6%
Score at this price: 26

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.63 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10022943045Valuation edge · as of 9 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1650/mo (range 1550-1800)Rental economics · as of 9 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 6 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 6 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1650/mo (range 1550-1800)
Stress margin needs verification before you rely on it
costs not disclosed by the advert

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£323,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,650

Gross Yield6.60%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-1.7%

5y Growth-0.9%

10y Growth+2.3%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0N17 9FF

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

HGY/2026/2877
Listed Building Consent for replacement fire doors to flats
Pending
HGY/2026/2933
Rear garden: Ash (T1) - fell. Pear (T2) - reduce crown by 1.5m. Reason: The ash is dying - 90+% of it had no leaves this year. It's right next to an outbuilding in neighbour's garden and could cause significant damage if limbs fail. The pear hasn't had its crown reduced for a while thus requires general maintenance. Neighbour at number 18 had bad subsidence this summer. One of the recommendations from their insurer's surveyor was to reduce the crown, though this was verbal and we're waiting for the written recommendation.
Pending
HGY/2026/2447
Replacement of existing single glazed timber framed casement windows to front and rear elevations with new double glazed timber framed casement windows.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership64.7%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining83 yrs
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeLeasehold
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

9 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£37,563

Population Density-

Owner Occupied18%

Age Distribution

0-15 21%16-64 76%65+ 3%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Harris Academy Tottenham
0.1 mi
Outstanding
Ferry Lane Primary School
0.3 mi
Good
Welbourne Primary School
0.3 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Holy Trinity CofE Primary School
0.4 mi
Outstanding

2 of 11 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

Coppermill Heights, 2 Daneland Walk
-
£425k
-
Coppermill Heights, 2 Daneland Walk
-
£159k
-
Coppermill Heights, 2 Daneland Walk
-
£140k
-
Coppermill Heights, 2 Daneland Walk
-
£400k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN