D Lg.02 Block D, Wilburn Basin, Ordsall Lane, Salford, M5 4XT

UPRN:10091478652-Beds -Built -

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band CEPC: C (80)

Data freshness:Planning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 4mo ago

D Lg.02 Block D, Wilburn Basin, Ordsall Lane, Salford, M5 4XT

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£266,000

£213k - £319kLow

Estimate

£266k

Range

£213k – £319k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

D Lg.02 Block D earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 74/100. Investment score 59/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Walkability is good (70/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

74/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

59/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

No data

Walkability

70/ 100

High

Transit & Bike

Transit 51Bike 49

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence1 independent sourceListing checked 3 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [sold-comps +14.2%, £/sqft +14.2%] → measured edge +0.50pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; AVM excluded (estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor)
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor · snapshot 10 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 10.3%· as of 4 Nov 2026
Rental economics0.9/40
gross yield 5.1% on contractual rent (listing-disclosed tenancy)
- listing_factscontractual rent 1000/mo (tenanted)· as of 3 Nov 2026
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -533/mo, -53% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; disclosed service charge and ground rent); fails the stress - earns nothing
- listing_factsservice charge / ground rent from the advert· as of 3 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 511 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 3 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity9.3/15
290 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 40%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£176,000£270,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 10.3%Valuation edge · as of 4 Nov 2026
listing_factscontractual rent 1000/mo (tenanted)Rental economics · as of 3 Nov 2026
listing_factsservice charge / ground rent from the advertStress margin · as of 3 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 3 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 511 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →flood, subsidence, crime, environment - the full domain

Plan

Before you offer

1. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
2. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£266,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth+5.2%

5y Growth+0.4%

10y Growth+5.1%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0M5 4XT

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

PLA-2026-002209
Installation of 1no. externally illuminated projecting sign and 2no. advertisement parasols to external seating area.
Pending
OTH-2026-002115
Non-Material Amendment to Planning Permission 137226/FO/2023 to amend the triggers on Conditions 21 (Phase 1: Material Samples and Specifications), 27 (Phase 1: Radar Mitigation Scheme), (Phase 1: Instrument Flight Procedure Surfaces), 30 (Phase 1: TV Broadband and Radio Reception), 61 (Phase 2: Material Samples and Specifications), 67 (Phase 2: Radar Mitigation Scheme) , 69 (Phase 2: Instrument Flight Procedure Surfaces) and 70 (Phase 2: TV Broadband and Radio Reception).
Pending
OTH/2026/1448
Consultation request from Manchester Council for Application No: PLA-2026-001905 for Temporary retention of 30m high temporary triangular ballast grillage tower, accommodating 2no. antenna and 2no. dish, and ground-based cabinets laid on railway sleepers for a time period of 3 years
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership18.7%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining238 yrs
CovenantsNone
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

13 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£30,495

Population Density6,523 /km²

Owner Occupied17%

Age Distribution

0-15 7%16-64 89%65+ 4%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

St Philip's CofE Primary School
0.4 mi
Good
Primrose Hill Primary School and Children's Centre
0.5 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
University of Salford
0.5 mi
-
Crown Street Primary School
0.5 mi
-

3 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

Block D Wilburn Basin Ordsall Lane
-
£230k
-
Block D Wilburn Basin Ordsall Lane
-
£225k
-
Block D Wilburn Basin Ordsall Lane
-
£253k
-
Block D Wilburn Basin Ordsall Lane
-
£226k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN