Oldbury, 26 Tudor Drive, Kingston upon Thames, KT2 5PZ

UPRN:128018747-Beds -Built -

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band EEPC: -

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 2mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

Oldbury, 26 Tudor Drive, Kingston upon Thames, KT2 5PZ

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

16 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£1,137,000

£1.02M - £1.25MMedium

Estimate

£1.14M

Range

£1.02M – £1.25M

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Oldbury earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 78/100. Investment score 57/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (67/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

78/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

57/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

8/ 100

Low

Walkability

67/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 42Bike 70

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge-0.6/15
claims [AVM -31.9% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge -0.12pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; asking more than 10% above the estimate (measured -0.33pp)
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 10 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 128018747· as of 10 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity12.8/15
259 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 128018747Valuation edge · as of 10 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 3 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
2. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£1,137,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth-1.0%

5y Growth-0.7%

10y Growth+1.8%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

1KT2 5PZ

Approval Rate

100%12mo

Development

low

PA26/3629
Details pursuant to condition C2. Sample panel of brickwork, C3. Materials, C5. Brick storage, and C6. materials to match existing, of listed building consent PA26/2288.
Pending
PA26/3686
T012 Oak tree - fell
Pending
PA26/3571
T1 Norway Maple, front lawn of 3 Martingales Close. A 4 metre crown reduction to previous reduction points, leaving a height of 7 metres and a canopy spread of 6 metres.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership45.5%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

6 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£41,833

Population Density4,744 /km²

Owner Occupied74%

Age Distribution

0-15 21%16-64 60%65+ 19%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Malden Oaks School and Tuition Service
0.2 mi
Good
The Tiffin Girls' School
0.4 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Meadlands Primary School
0.5 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
The Kingston Academy
0.5 mi
Outstanding

4 of 13 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

42 Tudor Drive
-
£1.20M
-
6 Tudor Drive
-
£1.15M
-
2A Tudor Drive
-
£840k
-
34 Tudor Drive
-
£930k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN