Flat 45 Alexander House, Royal Quarter, Seven Kings Way, Kingston upon Thames, KT2 5BY

UPRN:128030414Flat/Maisonette3 bedsBuilt 2003-2006

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: -EPC: D (62)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 4mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

Flat 45 Alexander House, Royal Quarter, Seven Kings Way, Kingston upon Thames, KT2 5BY

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

2 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

20 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£689,000

£655k - £724kHigh

Estimate

£689k

Range

£655k – £724k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£3,000

£3k - £3k

Monthly

£3,000

Yield

5.54%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Flat 45 Alexander House earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 84/100. Investment score 68/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is excellent (97/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

84/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

68/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

19/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

97/ 100

Excellent

Transit & Bike

Transit 100Bike 74

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

listing is 'Sold subject to contract' - sale already progressing, not an actionable opportunity

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Economics

What happens to your money

Your assumptions

Purchase price£650,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£3,000/mo

Evidenced range £2,750-£3,250

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £218,800
Net cash flow: -£117/mo
Cash on cash: -0.6%
Score at this price: -

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.37 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion

Property risk deep-dive →flood, subsidence, crime, environment - the full domain

Plan

Before you offer

1. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£689,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£3,000

Gross Yield5.54%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-1.0%

5y Growth-0.7%

10y Growth+1.8%

Last Sold Price£500,000 (2010-08-20)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0KT2 5BY

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/02353/TCA
T1: Eucalyptus - Reduce the height by 2- 2.5 metres and remove the scaffold limb over the fence. T3: Birch - Reduce by 1.5 metres.
Pending
26/02313/TPO
T1: Silver Birch - 0.5-1m Crown reduction.
Pending
26/02299/NMA
Application for a Non-Material Amendment to Planning Permission ref: 24/02624/CREG3 (Provision of a new leisure centre comprising main pool and learner pool, fitness studios, gym, sports halls, health suite, changing facilities, cafe, soft play, enhancements to the existing play area, landscaping and public realm, cycle parking, blue badge car parking, access and associated works. Listed building consent for partial removal of Kingston Museum boundary railings and wall and changes to the Kingston Museum garden.). Amendments comprising minor landscape and public realm refinements; revisions to access, parking, cycle parking and tree planting; detailed updates to the building elevations, facade components, plant and services; and minor internal layout improvements.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership45.5%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining999+ yrs
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeLeasehold
Last Ownership Change2010-08-20
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

27 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£41,833

Population Density30,420 /km²

Owner Occupied20%

Age Distribution

0-15 21%16-64 75%65+ 4%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Educare Small School
0.3 mi
Good
St John the Baptist Church of England Junior School
0.3 mi
GoodImproving
St Luke's CofE Primary School
0.4 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Hampton Wick Infant and Nursery School
0.4 mi
Outstanding

3 of 8 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

Alexander House Royal Quarter
-
£425k
-
Alexander House Royal Quarter
-
£340k
-
Alexander House Royal Quarter
-
£530k
-
Alexander House Royal Quarter
-
£525k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN