Flat, 11 The Pond House, 88–92 Turners Hill, Cheshunt, Waltham Cross, EN8 8LQ

UPRN:148048798Flat/MaisonetteBeds -Built -

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band BEPC: B (83)

Data freshness:Price Paid· freshPlanning· freshEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

Flat, 11 The Pond House, 88–92 Turners Hill, Cheshunt, Waltham Cross, EN8 8LQ

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

17 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

-- - --

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Flat earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 78/100. Crime intensity is moderate. Walkability is excellent (88/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsHM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

78/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

No data

Crime Score

42/ 100

Elevated

Walkability

88/ 100

Excellent

Transit & Bike

Transit 15Bike 44

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Reduced confidence2 independent sourcesLead to verifyListing checked 6 Nov 2026

Fewer independent sources agree, or a component could not be scored.

Check before relying on this score: leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress test assumes GBP 0. It ranks after every home whose inputs are verified.

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [sold-comps +29.1%, £/sqft +29.1%] → measured edge +0.50pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; AVM excluded (no market estimate available)
no market estimate available · snapshot 10 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 9.4%· as of 23 Oct 2026
Rental economics20.9/40
gross yield 7.6% on contractual rent (listing-disclosed tenancy)
- listing_factscontractual rent 1300/mo (tenanted)· as of 6 Nov 2026
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -39/mo, -3% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing; leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress assumes GBP 0
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 6 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 141 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 6 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity9/15
316 sales/12mo in area
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£154,000£235,500

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 9.4%Valuation edge · as of 23 Oct 2026
listing_factscontractual rent 1300/mo (tenanted)Rental economics · as of 6 Nov 2026
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 6 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 6 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is reduced
fewer independent sources agree, or a component could not be scored
Stress margin needs verification before you rely on it
costs not disclosed by the advert
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 141 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
2. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate-

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth+1.8%

5y Growth+2.4%

10y Growth+3.6%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

3EN8 8LQ

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

07/26/0858/TW
1x Yew tree in front garden - reducing its width to 12 feet and the height by 2 feet as in previous application (07/20/0787/TW). 4x Oak trees (3 trees in front garden and 1 in rear garden) reducing and shaped as in previous application which was for pruning works to the larger branches above 12ft from ground level and deadwood and tidy crown to shape.
Pending
07/26/0853/HF
Single storey rear extension
Pending
07/26/0840/F
Retrospective change of use of garage as a beauticians
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership57.9%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining117 yrs
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeLeasehold
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (-)

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£37,283

Population Density-

Owner Occupied51%

Age Distribution

0-15 21%16-64 67%65+ 12%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Burleigh Primary School
0.2 mi
Good
Arlesdene Nursery School and Pre-School
0.2 mi
Outstanding
Millbrook School
0.2 mi
Requires improvement
Downfield Primary School
0.4 mi
Area grades2024
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.

4 of 13 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

The Pond House, 88 - 92 Turners Hill
-
£240k
-
88 - 92 Turners Hill
-
£10k
-
Ripleys Yard, 62 Turners Hill
-
£292k
-
Ripleys Yard, 62 Turners Hill
-
£300k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN