First Floor and Second Floor Flat, 9 Silvester Road, London, SE22 9PD

UPRN:200003470698-Beds -Built -

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band CEPC: -

Data freshness:Listing· freshOwnership· freshRisk· 5mo agoCrime· freshConnectivity· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

First Floor and Second Floor Flat, 9 Silvester Road, London, SE22 9PD

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£513,000

£410k - £616kLow

Estimate

£513k

Range

£410k – £616k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

First Floor and Second Floor Flat earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 87/100. Investment score 75/100 reflects strong fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is excellent (93/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

87/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

75/ 100

High

Crime Score

12/ 100

Low

Walkability

93/ 100

Excellent

Transit & Bike

Transit 60Bike 69

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires valuation_edge (estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor)
headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Risk & liquidity9.2/15
275 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 40%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 12 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Valuation edge could not be scored
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available

Plan

Before you offer

1. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
2 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
2. Fill the valuation edge gap before relying on the score.
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
3. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
4. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£513,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth+44.1%

3y Growth+2.5%

5y Growth-0.2%

10y Growth+1.6%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningModerate
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

3SE22 9PD

Approval Rate

100%12mo

Development

low

26/AP/3329
Works to tree with a TCA: T1 - Beech: clear garage by 1m T2 - Cypress: Fair T3 - Lime: Reduce back to previous pollard Points as pollarding is now lapsed T4 - Elm: Reduce by 1m to relieve pressure on pollard attachment T5 - Lime: Pollard to previous pollard points to reduce pressure on decay point T6 - Cypress: Fair T7 - Lime: Fair T8 - Cypress: One sided, shaded out by adjacent trees T9 - Lime: Lateral branches have been reduced, 3m regrowth T10 - Lime: Re-pollard @ 4m due to decay, and reduce adjacent tree T2 by 2m to compensate for loss of companion shelter
Pending
26/AP/3307
T3 Oak of the submitted MWA Arboricultural Report Works: Remove (fell) to near ground level. Owner to physically remove any regrowth (no chemical treatment due to translocation risk). Reason: Clay shrinkage subsidence damage at neighbouring property 155 Court Lane, SE21 7EE. NOT: Application is also being made to Dulwich Estates.
Pending
26/AP/3281
Installing a new set of doors and a new window.
Pending

View Planning Timeline