3 Princes Place, London, W11 4QA

UPRN:217105320-Beds -Built -

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band FEPC: -

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· freshRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· freshAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£511,000

£409k - £614kLow

Estimate

£511k

Range

£409k – £614k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

3 Princes Place earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 75/100. Investment score 63/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is excellent (94/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

75/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

63/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

34/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

94/ 100

Excellent

Transit & Bike

Transit 60Bike 78

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires valuation_edge (estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor)
headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Risk & liquidity9.2/15
192 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 40%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 5 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Valuation edge could not be scored
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the valuation edge gap before relying on the score.
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£511,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth-3.7%

5y Growth-0.9%

10y Growth-0.5%

Last Sold Price£510,000 (2003-07-31)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

1W11 4QA

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

P/2026/02795/DET
Submission of details of the following external facing materials (including manufacturer's specifications, photographs and/ or a physical sample) comprising of: External walls; Porcelain tiles pursuant to condition 4 of planning permission ref: P/2026/02040/FUL granted 2nd October 2026.
Pending
P/2026/02674/DET
Discharge of Condition 51 (Stopped Vehicles at-grade) of Planning Permission (ref: 2023/01965/VAR) dated 21 August 2024.
Pending
P/2026/02569/TREE
Priority A works as per survey 40294 recommendations Tree numbers - G45 - Amelanchier sp. Recommendations - Fell 2x dead trees in row (1x Outside Urban Baristas, 1x Outside Oaktree Interiors). T116 - Magnolia sp. Recommendations - Fell dead Cornus adjacent. Priority B works as per survey 40294 recommendations Tree numbers - "T19 - Cornelian Cherry (Cornus mas) - Recommendations - Prune by removing around 1m regrowth to shape and tidy. " "T20 - Cornelian Cherry (Cornus mas) - Recommendations - Prune by removing around 1m regrowth to shape and tidy. " "T22 - Cornus contreversa - Recommendations - Prune to give 0.25m clearance from pergola. Thorough deadwood removal. Remove crossing branches. " "G59 - Red Oak (Quercus rubra) - Recommendations - Thorough deadwood removal. Prune to give 0.5m clearance from signage. " "T66 - Pin Oak (Quercus palustris) - Recommendations - Reduce crown by around 1m height and 0.5m spread. Thorough deadwood removal." "T71 - Wild Cherry (Prunus avium) - Recomme... read more
Pending

View Planning Timeline