63 West End, Sedgefield, Stockton-on-Tees, TS21 2BW

UPRN:100110500703- bedsBuilt -

-Council Tax: -EPC: D (66)AI-Powered Intelligence

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· 2mo agoPlanning· 2mo agoEPC· 1mo agoRisk· 3mo agoCrime· 2mo agoConnectivity· 3mo agoSchools· 3mo agoAmenities· 3mo agoArea· Census 2021

63 West End, Sedgefield, Stockton-on-Tees, TS21 2BW

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

yesterday

BUY
Strong overall fundamentals
INVESTIGATE
Some risks
AVOID
High risk factors

Confidence

High

Sale Estimate

£172,000

£137k - £206kLow

Estimate

£172k

Range

£137k – £206k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - ---

AI Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

AI summary

63 West End earns a BUY rating with HP Score 75/100. Investment score 60/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (63/100). Flood risk is rated very low. Verdict and headline figures are derived from the live HomePortfolio API; narrative deep-dives below combine real signals with modelled analytics.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterZoopla ListingsHP Property IntelligenceOfcom Connected NationsMobile Coveragevalue historyplanning signalsHP Walkability v2ONS Census 2021Police.ukPlanIt / LA PortalsHMLR CCODHMLR CovenantsHMLR Price PaidEnvironment Agency RoFRaSDefra Noise MapOSM AmenitiesOfsted / GIAS

HP Score

75/ 100

High

Investment Score

60/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

11/ 100

Low

Walkability

63/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Moderate

Real Data

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires valuation_edge (estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor (measured MdAPE 25.8%))
headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Seller motivation10/20
0 price cut(s), 84 days on market; calibration: cuts mark staleness, credited as negotiation context only
- zoopla_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 10 Sept 2026
Risk & liquidity6.1/10
192 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 40%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

zoopla_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 10 Sept 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Valuation edge could not be scored
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor (measured MdAPE 25.8%)
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available

Property risk deep-dive →flood, subsidence, crime, environment - the full domain

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the valuation edge gap before relying on the score.
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor (measured MdAPE 25.8%)
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£172,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-66.7%

3y Growth-4.0%

5y Growth-1.8%

10y Growth+2.5%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskVery low
Subsidence2
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
Landslide1
Air QualityUnknown
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

1TS21 2BW

Approval Rate

100%12mo

Development

low

DM/26/01212/FPA
Installation of electric vehicle charging point to the front of dwelling
Approved
CountyDurham/DM/24/00975/FPA
Re-roof, installation of 2no. roof lights to front, 1no. dormer to rear and conversion of loft to habitable room
Approved
CountyDurham/DM/23/02968/FPA
Proposed two-storey dwelling to land to the rear of 5 West End, Sedgefield, Stockton on Tees and associated parking and the felling of 3 No. Trees
Rejected

View Planning Timeline