5 Riverside Court, Leeds, LS1 7BU

UPRN:72034852Purpose Built Flat2 bedsBuilt 1983-1990

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band DEPC: E (51)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 4mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 5mo ago

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£183,000

£174k - £192kHigh

Estimate

£183k

Range

£174k – £192k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,000

£950 - £1k

Monthly

£1,000

Yield

5.45%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

5 Riverside Court earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 60/100. Investment score 54/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is elevated. Walkability is excellent (97/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

60/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

54/ 100

Moderate

100

Crime Score

100/ 100

Elevated

Walkability

97/ 100

Excellent

Transit & Bike

Transit 100Bike 55

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 3 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge-1.6/15
claims [AVM -20.2% (HIGH)] → measured edge -0.33pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; asking more than 10% above the estimate (measured -0.33pp)
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 12 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 72034852· as of 12 Oct 2026
Rental economics3.3/40
gross yield 5.5%; range width penalty ×0.90
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1000/mo (range 950-1100)· as of 12 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -474/mo, -47% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; disclosed service charge and ground rent); fails the stress - earns nothing
- listing_factsservice charge / ground rent from the advert· as of 3 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 36 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 3 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.7/15
49 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£165,000£253,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£220,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,000/mo

Evidenced range £950-£1,100

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £69,200
Net cash flow: -£50/mo
Cash on cash: -0.9%
Score at this price: 16

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.35 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 72034852Valuation edge · as of 12 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1000/mo (range 950-1100)Rental economics · as of 12 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
listing_factsservice charge / ground rent from the advertStress margin · as of 3 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 3 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1000/mo (range 950-1100)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 36 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£183,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,000

Gross Yield5.45%

1y Growth-21.0%

3y Growth-13.7%

5y Growth-3.3%

10y Growth+0.7%

Last Sold Price£70,000 (2022-10-14)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonModerate
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0LS1 7BU

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/06005/S106
Application to modify section 106 planning obligation relating to planning application 22/07121/FU to carve out the S278 infrastructure/highway works from the 'commencement of development' definition as they now form part of the early enabling works; The words 'highway works agreed under condition 24 of the Planning Permission' are to be added to this definition; The definition of the 'Enabling Works Permission' is updated to reflect the latest planning approval reference 26/02245/FU
Pending
26/9/00167/MOD
Outline Planning Application for the demolition of the existing substation and buildings, creation of a mixed use multi-level development comprising residential (BtR), commercial (offices and leisure), hotel and a travel hub - NON MATERIAL AMENDMENT TO 22/04827/OT - This non-material amendment application is submitted to amend a number of conditions on the outline approval so as to clearly distinguish conditions relating to built phases of development and those relating to the S278 highway works and other remedaition / enabling works. It is proposed to undertake these infrastructure/enabling works first prior to formally commencing built phases.
Pending
26/9/00166/MOD
Enabling works associated with the major mixed use development approved under 22/04827/OT and as per previous approval 22/07121/FU - NON-MATERIAL AMENDMENT TO 26/02245/FU - NMA Proposal
Pending

View Planning Timeline