88 Haven Chase, Leeds, LS16 6SG

UPRN:72265625Detached House3 bedsBuilt 1991-1995

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band DEPC: D (55)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 3mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 4mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£343,000

£326k - £360kHigh

Estimate

£343k

Range

£326k – £360k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,300

£1k - £1k

Monthly

£1,300

Yield

4.52%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

88 Haven Chase earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 68/100. Investment score 55/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (49/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

68/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

55/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

27/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

49/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 29Bike 19

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 3 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM -0.6% (HIGH)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 72265625· as of 9 Oct 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 4.5%; range width penalty ×0.82
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1300/mo (range 1200-1450)· as of 9 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -630/mo, -48% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 3 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 248 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 3 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.7/15
415 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£259,000£396,500

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£345,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,300/mo

Evidenced range £1,200-£1,450

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £112,050
Net cash flow: -£264/mo
Cash on cash: -2.8%
Score at this price: 15

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.12 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 72265625Valuation edge · as of 9 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1300/mo (range 1200-1450)Rental economics · as of 9 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 3 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 3 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1300/mo (range 1200-1450)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 248 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£343,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,300

Gross Yield4.52%

1y Growth-18.7%

3y Growth-0.2%

5y Growth+0.8%

10y Growth+3.5%

Last Sold Price£185,000 (2006-06-30)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonModerate
MiningLow
LandslideModerate
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

1LS16 6SG

Approval Rate

100%12mo

Development

low

26/06135/DHH
6m single storey rear extension, 3m to ridge height and 2.95m to eaves (flat roof)
Pending
26/06144/TR
Silver Birch - fell the tree to ground level and remove all arisings from site. The tree has developed an acute lean towards the neighbouring propertys as it has grown in search of available light. 2 x Lawson Cypress - Fell both Lawson cypress trees to ground level and remove all arisings from site. They have reached maturity and have outgrown their location, resulting in excessive shading and reducing natural light to the garden. Their continued growth is likely to increase competition with the adjacent beech trees and further diminish the amenity value of the garden.
Pending
26/05761/FU
Demolition of extension and removal of decking to rear and erection of a single storey extension, alterations and enlargement of the second-floor dormer and alterations and extension to the existing garage and home office to rear; single storey front extension; replacement windows to front side and rear
Pending

View Planning Timeline